Why you took away Exodus? It was just perfect to play for people who can't play on 128 servers. Maps rotation also was great.
Are you serious????
Bringn it back!!!!!
😠😠😠😠
Could be so easy, just a 64 player mode with exodus and following maps:
@AngrySquid270 wrote:I bounce between the PS4 and PS5 (Exodus) servers.
At least I used to.
Now it's PS4 all the time. 128p maps never clicked for me.
Imho you really shouldn't have to do that in a Battlefield title, you should have permanent access to your favourite mode.
When do they do the updates now? On Tuesday when they add stuff back?
@GrizzGolf wrote:When do they do the updates now? On Tuesday when they add stuff back?
I actually think it's on Thursdays.
@RayD_O1 wrote:
@AngrySquid270 wrote:I bounce between the PS4 and PS5 (Exodus) servers.
At least I used to.
Now it's PS4 all the time. 128p maps never clicked for me.
Imho you really shouldn't have to do that in a Battlefield title, you should have permanent access to your favourite mode.
Agreed with you all !
What still puzzles me is why EA/DICE even put any resources at all into dictating to their customers what game maps and game modes now they want us to be restricted to play on???
Why even spend one single split second of valuable developer time on building constraints in the game and limitations for the open free choice of their paying customers to seek and enjoy the type of map and game mode they may individually prefer now to be entertained by?
As if the developers would not have any other topics to fix first???
(Hint: please check the ever escalating bug list and missing functionalities. Legacy or not...)
As very successfully demonstrated in previous BF versions with a server browser, then the player population truly enjoy the transparency and choice across the various servers with different maps and game modes currently active, and its visible to all if they are like squad vs squad 5vs5, 10vs10, or maybe 32vs32 or 128vs128, And what maps are popular and populated and which less so. And which game modes are popular and which less so.
But darn EA/DICE,
Leave all the contents available in the game!
So it is always there and let the player population take care of the rest, with a free choice to go where they prefer at any point of time.
Enough of that silly and resource wasting autocracy and manipulating dictatorship!
@CyberDyme wrote:
@RayD_O1 wrote:
@AngrySquid270 wrote:I bounce between the PS4 and PS5 (Exodus) servers.
At least I used to.
Now it's PS4 all the time. 128p maps never clicked for me.
Imho you really shouldn't have to do that in a Battlefield title, you should have permanent access to your favourite mode.
Agreed with you all !
What still puzzles me is why EA/DICE even put any resources at all into dictating to their customers what game maps and game modes now they want us to be restricted to play on???
Why even spend one single split second of valuable developer time on building constrain ts in the game and limitations for the open free choice of their paying customers to seek and enjoy the type of map and game mode they may individually prefer niow to be entertained by?
As if the developers would not have any other topics to fix first???
(Hint: please check the ever escalating bug list and missing functionalities. Legacy or not...)
As very successfully demonstrated in previous BF versions with a server browser, then the player population truly enjoy the transperancy and choice across the various servers with different maps and game modes currently active, and its visible to all if they are like squad vs squad 5vs5, 10vs10, or maybe 32vs32 or 128vs128, And what maps are popular and populated and which less so. And which game modes are popular and which less so.W
But darn EA/DICE,
Leave all the contents available in the game!
So it is always there and let the player population take care of the rest, with a free choice to go where they prefer at any point of time.
Enough of that silly and resource wasting autocracy and manipulating dictatorship!
Good post that sums it up perfectly. 👍
Let all players get whatever fun they can out of BF2042, that's what they bought it for after all.
Wholeheartedly agree. I simply can't believe fathom why DICE keeps rotating modes in and out. Exodus Conquest was by far my favourite playlist, not only because it had consistent GREAT maps in the rotation - but also because it is one of the only modes where I can have a stable performance without lag or rubberbanding which occurs a lot in 128 player levels.
@Straatford87 I have a question for you: How come DICE said in the Season 1 dev update that you wanted to focus on giving players choice to shape their own experience and find EXACTLY the experience they want - and in the same breath keep removing modes??? Especially when the game is already segregated enough as it is. Wasn't the point of porting weapons to bring more content to AoW? So why remove maps? It makes NO sense DICE. Please explain.
Agreed on all your points.
If i go to the cardealer to buy a car and says "I want all the included premium furniture, sound systems etc" and i will pay for it.. The next day i get the car delivered and being told by the cardealer that "Oh no, u cant have it all at once, you have to come back in next month to be able to have the sound system, and the other month after that to get 1 car seat in premium leather".
GIVE US 64 PLAYER MODE PERMANENT NOW!
Dice: W8 a minute, u can have 64 player mode, but only as a "feature" because why use a gamemode that made us famous from the start?
@Zhymmer wrote:@JOGAGATYAIn old maps, most objectives are closer to each other there's no real useless space where you have to run for 5 mins without seeing anyone to get to the next site. Don't get me wrong some maps did make you run for 5mins straight but i didn't consider those maps good either.
Stranded objectives seems to be closer to each other and i haven't played enough of Stranded to say anything about the gameplay. I'm just not a fan of the art style of the shipping containers everywhere.
I don't think all new maps are bad and some of them are getting a rework which is great. But let's take Exposure for exemple. In 64 players you have 2 sites at the bottom of the map and the rest is up top. That means they expect players (infantry) to run all the way back to the top once they captured the objective down there. You'll also notice there's less players at those objective.
And they already designed so many maps in older battlefield, bringing back some of the old one would give them more time to develop new maps that are enjoyable and maybe releasing a bundle and not 1 at a time.
Exposure and Kaleidoscope just do not work very well in 64 player versions, especially Exposure. I found most rounds extremely dull on both maps.
That was the only downside of Exodus Conquest playlist. Preferred it when the two 2042 maps were Discarded and Manifest which work very well in the 64 player versions.
@RayD_O1i agree. this whole rotation thing is garbage. not sure what they think they are accomplishing with it but all they are really doing is irritating their player base. there should be breakthrough and conquest, on pc/next gen it should be an option for 128 or 64. for conquest at least (i would say breakthrough as well but i don't have a dog in that fight as i play on xbox one and like the experience i get there)
