Looking at the map in some videos they seem too large for the player count? Back in the dial up times Joint ops had 150 players 17 years ago, why hasn't tech moved on to offer a really big player count experience? Since Joint Ops no game really offered that many players per server maybe Planetside? I'm sure tech has gotten better in the 17 years but no one seems to want to go over 150 :P
I really like the giant maps because they're 'empty' enough to have localized Battles .
War is "long periods of boredom mixed with short moments of panic" -(unknown)
We lose this Contemplation of March Into Battle (a thing) if a big map is filled with Players .
War over each shoulder and everywhere else one looks is . . . well , another Game .
Or 'Op Underground' 😛
@tempo_rarity I don't know in Pubg similar size map it was intense as any second its over.. in a normal MP game its going to get boring more time running about looking for ppl imo. If every map is that big.
You quote a real quote for war in a game with a robodog 😉
It becomes a mess sometimes. Sometimes it’s cool. It’s really about clusters of players and vehicles in various map sections. This can be more manageable with few players and vehicles or render a tank useless due to 50 lock on weapons. Really have to work on those sections and the player flows over sheer numbers.
@Trokey66 About the same? MP gaming only uses KB in data. 1-2 meg at most for warzone type.
The map size isn't too big but I felt there are too many capture points dividing players focus. I never got that large battle feeling that I get from other Battlefield games at 64 players. I'm not sure more players would make too much of a difference but map design that draws players into more focused objectives would make a big difference.
