Why not 200+ players? (Map size)
Looking at the map in some videos they seem too large for the player count? Back in the dial up times Joint ops had 150 players 17 years ago, why hasn't tech moved on to offer a really big player cou...
Forum Discussion
I would really like to see this but I doubt.
I guess the Frostbite Engine isn't able to handle this huge amount of informations yet and I don't think it will ever be.
Consoles are able to handle the huge amount of informations.
It is all about how the engines are written/coded, how streaming of assets works and how the netcode works when in a very rare case 1000 Players are on the exact same location. In other words it is about clever resource management. There are not many true MMOFP-Shooter availabe (I count as MMO at a Playercount 100+) and the most games that are MMOFPS are using mostly the same assets in just different colors with low detail models which is logical to offer a good performance if you reach a bussy area with a huge playercount.
I played MAG (Multi-Action-Game) on Playstation 3, it was fun but the performance was hell. I also played PlanetSide 2 on Playstation 4 and the Performance runs well but on costs of low graphics.
If I had to advice to get a MMOFPS get working I would count a few things like:
- Accessability (free-to-play, very low buy to play)
- performance and quality
- Microtransactions through Premium currency, Battle-Pass, skins & models (re-finance server & service costs, earning money)
- A very hard anti-cheat and an anti-cheat task force
- the right setting (medieval, Sci-Fi, present)
- a plot which explains the conflict and may the architecture
@CloudMcRip Loved MAG Why it didn't get new version I got no idea.
Maybe when I play the beta it will play ok. Why did they need Pubg sized maps anyways. I feel its like the current AC games way too big just to be big as a selling point.
