Yall really didnt like BFV?

---

@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:

BFV has a few cardinal sins.

1) It is an incomplete abandoned game

2) It is full of cheaters

3) It does not support permanent community servers (which is also a problem in 2042)

---

I would like to one more sin to the list now that I think about it:

4) Health attrition and vehicle ammo attrition was one of the worst things they decided to re introduce in BFV.

BFV could become an even greater game with additional 4 maps. Eastern Front expansion pack might also include new vehicles and weapons. Devs and publishers have to redefine their roles at this point. The main focus on Social Justice Warrior ideology in the shooter genre is as much desirable as Human Rights activists in an illegal weapons factory before lockdown. It is a shooter game, this does not include any form of correctness, except one - shooting. Having an unfinished and partially broken game that resonates with terrible gameplay decisions is a big no-no. That, in addition, pushes suitable at this moment of history agenda is a disastrous move. Players are here to stay for great gameplay, not further monetization gameplay-wise havoc. Rightful for the time being agenda usually turns into a Soviet-style propaganda machine.

Pushing for monetization while completely ignoring gameplay mechanics is harmful in the long run. Seriously, how profitable might be antagonizing the loyal player base by pointless money-driven changes? That`s one of many main reasons why the player base is rightfully angry. And will continue to be if the changes won`t turn into radical 180 degrees course.  

I checked the comments, I did not even start bashing the franchise before the reviews hit hard.

Shortly put. EA should stop playing politics and improve finally gameplay experience as God Allmighty rightfully commanded. EA should stop pretending like it is being oppressed by the extremely dangerous keyboard warriors like me and SubReddit`s page while the game launch is not ahead of schedule or stable by any means. And there is literally no love letter except for one finger (You do know which one and where exactly) pointed at the majority of customers with Surprise Mechanic as the main drive for this hell of a ssshow. And right now publisher wants us to believe that DICE is solely the weak cog in the process. I mean how full of surprises someone has to be to ignore all of this. 

---

@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:
@SirBobdkI also thought it was a good idea until I saw it in practice.

What I expected: Vehicles coming and making a huge impact then going back to rearm giving a breathing window.

What we got: Basically the same vehicle impact as before or worse with a chore added.

————————————————————————————————————-

 

In BFV I think it had more to do with Planes being Farming Machines and bad mapdesign.

In BFV you were almost back in action as fast as by auto rearm

Back in time I think it worked fine when you were to fly over the air strip to re arm and the maps were large.

 

---

@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:
@SirBobdkTheir impact was still a joke by the end though.
This is not what bombing is supposed to feel like.

---

You mean the carpet bombing and rocket spamming.

@SirBobdkMy point stands.

The Irony that the rockets of the fighters ended up being more effective anti ground weapons than the bombs is also not lost on me

---

@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:

@SirBobdkMy point stands.

The Irony that the rockets of the fighters ended up being more effective anti ground weapons than the bombs is also not lost on me

---

I stopped Playing BFV More than 1 1/2 Year Ago. Did The Change the Bombs on the Bombers in vanilla
I Know they did on the Pacific to a point where they were more or less useless.