Battlefield 6 Feedback

I feel the same👍 Good points👍

Small maps that are same size as similar maps in previous titles...

There will be bigger maps definitely but the city maps we have in beta is not small by bf3,  b4, bf1 standards at all. Seine crossing was same size, Grand bazaar was smaller, Zavod was same size, Flooded was same size,  Amiens same sized, all maps in Dragons teeth dlc is smaller or same size, same with aftermath dlc. Just to mention some examples. I just think empty the running simulator maps in bf2042 have people forgetting how classic bf city maps actually were made.

Cod maps is way smaller than these unless you think of the lousy conquest clone mode.

Nussepus​ 

Seine crossing - just checked that, 600 m from one edge to another. So all 3 maps are smaller than this ;) and Zavod is even bigger than seine crossing. Flooded allowed way more vertical traversal. And dlc you can easily avoid like i did if the maps were too small. You have pointed out small maps from few games (and in most cases they are bigger than these in beta) and here we know that 5 out of 9 maps are going to be small.

Edit. And i just checked Amiens. 550 m from base to base:) so again it is way bigger than maps in this beta:)

I interpret points 5 and 6 slightly differently. In particular, new players are not put off by the faster entry point. Personally, I wouldn't be interested in a game where everyone has the meta weapon and I have to grind for two months to get an equivalent one. That's why I think the current setup is ideal and shouldn't be changed. Unless, of course, you want to remain a niche game.

What should be changed is the weapon balance. If I don't stand a chance in close combat with an MP7 compared to other weapons, that's imbalanced. Could you remove or properly adjust it? It's way too weak.

The main problem right now is the network code.
Death delay occurs even when you're already taking cover.
– "Magic bullet": You fall down in half a second even if you fired first.
And that's with a ping of 17 ms and no packet loss!

It's difficult to comment on the weapons because with this network code, you'd have to guess.

I agree with all points and hope dice truly consider point 3. Its so hard to come across extra ammo and we're like only getting 3 mags on an assault rifle.

I feel like the attachments are only unlocking this quickly for the purpose of the beta - still getting that battlefield unlock high but making sure that you don't have to spend the entire beta period trying to max a single gun.  

And about the maps, whether they are actually the same size as past entries' map sizes or not, the maps in this beta feel more dense if anything. They can sometimes feel very clustered with buildings, debris and objects littered about everywhere and I find it all very overwhelming. Also there doesn't feel like there's many options when it comes to back capping due to the corridor-like structure of maps like Cairo and Iberian Offensive. While I'm not saying I'd rather the maps be open barren like bf2042 but maps like Hainan, Shanghai and Firestorm all benefit from having that extra space there so everything isn't just constant meat-grinder.

I did not say that they are the same size as cod, but rather they feel like cod

I feel like Assault should remain as the medic and support stay as the ammo supplier, it always worked back in battle 3, 4, and 1 and taking that away from them kind of leaves assault in a weird position of not having anything really unique? Like Recon was also a spotter, respawn capable unit, engineer was able to destroy and repair vehicles, support supply ammo, and assault supply health and revive players, taking that away from assault leaves them in an area of just being a run and gun role and takes away from the team work. each class should intertwine with each other but assault being a lone wolf now makes it kind of a useless role.

I agree on the colored obj borders. It detracts from the gritty feel with all these colored objects all over. With the added flagpole you would get a feeling for where the center of the objective is, and the rest of the zone/borders can be seen in the minimap. 

I also found it difficult to see who was Squad leader, and missed the Request order in commorose. 

Grenade direct throw is a bit boring. But as long as they cant be thrown further than now I guess it doesnt really matter. I liked the old BF2 nades, where you could cook and short throw up on a closeby roof for example, or aim and throw longer/higher arc. 

This seemed like the best place to leave my feedback so I will do it here.

The game in my view is perfect, there are some bugs and some stuff to work on, glitching scopes, lobby is busted, every other round me or someone I play with either gets left behind, or your just stuck on the loading screen.

Mostly Devs, please dont listen to cry babbies, your first reaction was right. Stick to your Fuggin Guns!!!

Shotgun - It sucks at range and frankly isnt that good medium either, to take full advantage of it you have to use Slugs, to get real range, its fine as it is dont cave. I maxed every gun in the game accept the 2nd LMG. The AR's, Carbine's, and SMG's are way stonger than the shotgun or the sniper rifle. If you have a 50 cal 1 shot sniper rifle, then that would even things out but, right now the "Automatic" classes are 100 times stronger than the Demo Sniper and Demo Shotgun.

Sniping - Love hate relationship, sometimes all I can see is Glint and cant see the actual head of sniper, which when counter snipping is really annoying. But is in all games dont touch!

Auto's - I see people crying about recoil, dont listen, the only gun that was actually Zero recoil was the AK, 5.56 varient. But that thing is shooting softpellets, I hated maxxing that thing out because of how weak and the Time to kill. Its dog water, but at long ranges it beats all others because there is no recoil. See, no recoil, no damage, everything else feels 2 times faster Time to kill, but has kick.

Pistol - Man that thing is weak 4 shots to kill, I was hiding in every corner, just trying to shoot people in the back to max out that thing. Its weak AF, I feel like if its that weak make it super accurate with little kick, if your gonna leave the damage low, remove the recoil, and save it for the DE, or Revolver. All in all its fine, I dont really need a pistol, it just kinda looks cool, but man if I had to depend on it, no thanks.

Maps, only 1 map is a true "Sniper" map which was disappointing, however the maps are amazing. I loved them, I just decided to only snipe on the Rocky Mountain map, and use other stuff on the other maps.

I think you guys did a fantastic job, the only thing I can actually complain about is the Sight attachments. They seem to I dont know "float" they are not that accurate, I would stuggle and get gunned down, lose guns fights, I know I won, then go back to Iron sights and start pulling out double and tripple kills. They dont see to be accurate, at long ranges they are fine, but up close they just feel...off. I go back to Iron sights and immediately am 100 times more accurate. This is on the 1x scopes. 

Overall, I am forsure buying its amazing stand your ground dont cave, listen to legit feedback like bugs, or like things feeling like they are not working, but please dont fall for the "give the community what they want" then the community destroys the game and everyone leaves. COD has give the community all creative control, and its complete **bleep**, unplayable. Please dont follow those footsteps, you made something amazing now stand firm and tell the babbies, to suck on there thumbs and leave ya be.

your not a bf player boy, this is your right, but dont came in bf to destroy it, Bf is a completed battlefield game, not an infantry game like cod, game is beautiful, feeling with the gun too, but the map even if they are beautiful, thats not bf map, a way too closed and small. And you are about to destroy rush, the point are a lot too closed, it's just do not feel like battlefield, just an other generic fps, you sell it like destruction is back.... WHAT A JOKE