BF6 Needs More Vehicles helicopters and Jets
More Vehicles with atleast each side 2 or 3 jet and helicopters like bf4 and bf3
in Beta conquest We had to wait we only had
1 heli , 1 jet
Forum Discussion
41 Replies
"You have got to be **bleep** to believe that it means 2 or 3 jets or helicopters when in your quote it states quite clearly "And" helicopters (you edited out the And *LOL*). This means there should be atleast 2 or 3 jets plus hopefully 2 helicopters and maybe more if they include transport variants on release."
How dumb can you be… I edited it because it wasn’t exactly what was written in the initial message. I had to correct it to reflect REALITY, not your own creepy interpretation. You didn’t even notice before sending your reply… You’re getting more pathetic by the second.
About the number of vehicles: as I said, 2 air vehicles are enough (again, not 1 like you claimed before, **bleep**). So you think 3 jets + 2 helis + 4/5 tanks maybe? Yeah, sure, you should be in charge of the next Battlefield. 20 PEOPLE inside vehicles on a 32-player team… brilliant idea. You are the cancer of the old fan base of this franchise, maybe even worse than the “COD players.” Not even able to consider game balance before spouting the dumbest crap on the forum.
Sorry dude, you keep living in your weird fantasy world. I’m not playing COD, maybe Hell Let Loose, but not COD. I never said that vehicle was hard to destroy **bleep**, I said it is "balance", you can understand that ?
I never claimed to speak for the entire player base—I’ve been talking for myself since the start of this discussion, unlike you, you crazy old fool.
Oh, and just to remind you, this is your sentence: “Like I and other people.”
Again, you completely missed this one:
atleast ==> at least
Seriously, stop trying to trash-talk someone who’s clearly leagues better than you in your own mother tongue… You’re just embarrassing yourself.
Thousands of hours of playing = ultimate authority, and because BF1 was more popular than 2042, vehicles must be evil…. classic correlation != causation. Maybe try applying that 5 minutes of thinking to your own argument first. 🤡
HAHA, you are a **bleep**ing liar. We can hear AA missile locks throughout the entire video. AA missiles are so easy to dodge that infantry prefer to grab an RPG and hope for a miracle to MAYBE hit the heli. ON THE GROUND, they cannot lock the heli, you **bleep**. You don’t even know the correct lock distance of the STINGER in your precious Battlefield.
The infantry doesn’t even have two seconds to shoot before being insta-killed by the heli. And the pilot is just circling around the building like a **bleep**, making it nearly impossible to lock and fire the rocket. And on this map, Shanghai, there IS NO JET xD. This is your “best Battlefield”? I have way more knowledge than you with 100 hours on the game, which I haven’t even touched in over 10 years. Omfg, you make my day—you show me how unbelievably dumb people who attack others on forums can be. Amazing!
So you have zero arguments for why having 3 helis like in this video, stomping the game, would be fun for anyone not inside them. Oh, maybe your brilliant solution is “take a heli to counter a heli” ? You really need to reinstall your favorite Battlefield, dude—it seems you haven’t played much at all.
AGAIN : atleast ==> at least
I'm actually done you just write a load of **bleep** everytime thinking your making proper points about whats being said and all of it is just bull **bleep**. You write stuff then edit it then go back on what you said it is all a load of crap! Arguing with you is like pissing into the wind.
- I was stating you meant 1 vehicle of each type which would be **bleep** you **bleep**!
- I understand that wasn't the actual title but tbh the way it reads it still holds true, and I wrote my response posted it then you edited it. So if I had not put that in my post then it would have just looked like I made the mistake when actually it was yourself you dumb **bleep**.
- You can't just clip bits of writing to make it suit your purposes out of context like that
“Like I and other people.”
the whole quote was actually
Like I and other people in this post have stated
Meaning not just me but evidencing other people within this post, keeping it relevant and inclusive of the others here actually.
- Glad your running everything through a word processor now :) I can understand you much better thanks.
- Stop replying in 2 posts your just a loser now **bleep** off and go play with your dolls you stupid little kid.
- Go back to COD or learn how to fight vehicles better bows and leaves.
- Blocked you for the peace of humanity and this thread ;)
Just my point of view, nothing more. If you want to have a different opinion, feel free to argue. And you’re doing the same thing as the other idiot—twisting my words. I said 2 ground + 2 air vehicles are enough. Not that vehicles must be evil.
You really need to work on your frustration, dude. Stop imagining things and attacking people with trash talk just because you’re mentally weak or frustrated that other players don’t want to face 5 jets, 6 helis, and 7 tanks.
Current maps are too small for more vehicles, that's a fact. Hopefully, there will be some large maps added.
xD “Write stuff then edit” – are you seriously not even able to read why I edited the post? You can’t understand that the exact sentence in the initial post was wrong?
1-That wasn’t your sentence, dude. Back to school. Words have meaning—you need to improve your ability to express yourself. Even Koko the gorilla would be better than you.
2-Dude, you’re a **bleep**. You can’t even check WHAT I MODIFIED before trying to trash-talk—this shows how limited you are. If your brain worked normally, you’d see that I edited my post to match the initial one. But no, you prefer typing “LOL” like a complete **bleep**.
3-I’m just giving proof that you’re accusing me of speaking for “the community” with zero arguments other than your twisted imagination. And look at you, dragging other people into it to try to make your replies look stronger (2 people in this conversation, btw).
4-Words? Another delusion ? And seriously, when you make so many mistakes in your own mother tongue, just STFU when someone from another country is trying to teach you something…
5-Again, I’m not playing COD. You’re still living in a fantasy world—take your pills.
Add a little bird to each side to all 4 beta maps and watch the dynamics of the game play change dramatically. It will add the 3rd dimension that is missing from this beta. A dimension that is what makes battlefield, battlefield.
For all of the people that don't like or suggest having very few vehicles, what is the purpose of an engineer class? Why do we have such a useless class/role if no vehicles or few vehicles? ENGINEERS are supposed to counter vehicles but if having few vehicles or no vehicles then why do they exist on BF6?
What is "few vehicle" ? On liberty pic we can have 25% of the players of a team inside HEAVY vehicle. (Tank+AA / Jet / Heli). What is your target ? 35% ? 50% ?
