Forum Discussion

Tarcan911's avatar
Tarcan911
Seasoned Rookie
21 hours ago

Sorry for bad Feedback and Suggestions for Battlefield 6

Hello Battlefield Team,

 

As a long-time follower of the Battlefield series, I’d like to share some important observations and development suggestions regarding Battlefield 6.

 

First, the current pace of the game is extremely fast. This speed undermines the unique strategic and tactical combat experience that defines Battlefield. The true spirit of the series lies not only in fast-paced engagements, but also in giving players time to breathe, plan, and work together as a team. Slowing the pace down slightly would help restore this balance.

 

Secondly, the current maps feel too small, cramped, and tightly packed. This design pushes players into close-quarters fights instead of large-scale frontline battles. One of Battlefield’s most iconic features has always been its large, open maps where different roles and strategies can thrive. Expanding the maps would give players more freedom to maneuver and create varied battle experiences.

 

In addition, the Portal mode could be greatly expanded. Bringing back modes and maps from classics like Battlefield 1942, BF3, BF4, and 2142 would be a huge win for the community. For large-scale warfare, 128-player battles could be introduced. Even more exciting would be innovative modes where three different armies could fight against each other simultaneously.

 

Most importantly, Battlefield should not be made to feel like Call of Duty or BF2042. The series is unique for its massive war atmosphere, large maps, vehicle combat, and tactical gameplay. With the right pacing and map design, Battlefield 6 could win back its long-time fans and deliver an unforgettable experience to new players alike.

 

Thank you, and best regards,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 Replies

  • Yeah if they would just remaster the maps from bf3 and bfbc2... Why always the need to reinvent the wheel?

  • Tarcan911's avatar
    Tarcan911
    Seasoned Rookie
    20 hours ago

    Yes, they absolutely need to bring back the classic Battlefield experiences. The potential for Portal is massive, and if used right, it could bring back a huge player base. Imagine having maps and full armies from BF3, BF4, BFBC2, BF1942, BF2, and BF2142 — all in one game. Now take it a step further: a massive Conquest mode on huge open maps where 2 ,3 ,4 different armies battle each other for territory control like squad deathmach. That’s the kind of innovation that would make Battlefield truly stand out again.

     

     

     

     

     

  • cornybbq2's avatar
    cornybbq2
    Seasoned Ace
    19 hours ago

    100% agree on the first part! Add all the maps from 2-3-4., or as many as possible. Caspian border, Noshahr Canals and Arica harbour are ready to go from 2042, add strike at karkand and kharg island, Operation firestorm is coming... That sounds like a good battlefield game to me!

    The second part i'm not so sure about. We've all seen what 128 players on a map look like. It becomes a circus... 

  • Tarcan911's avatar
    Tarcan911
    Seasoned Rookie
    18 hours ago

    But I think they can add armies too from BF2 BF 2142 and Bf1942 

About Battlefield 6 Beta General Discussion & Feedback

Discuss the Battlefield 6 Beta with the community. Give feedback and share your experiences!2,156 PostsLatest Activity: 28 minutes ago