It is a weak point that bigger parties will unbalance servers. This was never a problem in Battlefield 3 and 4, and to my knowledge in Battlefield 1. Limiting people's playstyle and creating an anti-community environment is absolutely detrimental to the game. The best example is 2042 which was an absolute sham and completely discouraged friends from playing together due to that exact limitation. The game has and always should be community building focused in order to encourage a longer life in terms of how long people will keep playing said game. When we had Battlelog for 3 and 4 it was the best of times because that platform was a social platform on its own and encouraged friends and players to compete with each other. I know that we will never get anything resembling Battlelog again but the least I can ask for is platoons/clans and the addition of larger parties so people can actually play with their friends and not get sent to another matchmake server after the round finishes.
It was a massive problem in bf3, on xbox anyway, too many well organised players on one side always ended in a spawn trap and the server emptying.
We had our own server and this was a constant problem so had to switch players so it was evan.
BF3 on Xbox was limited to 12v12 so sure, one team stacking could cause imbalance but BF6 will be primarily 32x32, 6-8 friends are not enough to cause the game to be unbalanced anymore than 4 friends would.
