It's amazing I can play 30 games of regular breakthrough, conquest, etc. The minute you join casual breakthrough each team will have at least 1 person rage hacking. EA should spend 90% of their time in this mode and they'd clear out a ton of cheaters.
given the bonus XP for everything this weekend, you won't stay low level for long. I took the new SMG from 0-35 in about 4 hours or so and went from level 295-300 in the same amount of time.
steam accounts with multiple bans. Why does EA let ppl with game bans play?
When EA bans a player on Steam, it bans their EA connected account and the player cannot unbind their account from Steam as they would have to disconnect it from EA.com in their account settings. Since EA essentially owns the player's account, they can prevent the unlinking. Personally, I think this should be up to the account owner to connect or disconnect an external account to their preferred platform. Many people have been falsely banned and had/have their Steam connected EA account locked without resolution from the Studio. I have seen where cheat providers offer stolen accounts that may have more than one VAC ban on record but not a ban from EA. EA did announce that they were going to issue VAC bans to Steam connected EA accounts, going forward.
You see cronus zen users and steam accounts with multiple bans. Why does EA let ppl with game bans play? They permaban for having steam user names no worse than bot names, but apparently cheaters are too large of a market to turn away?
The cheaters came out heavy for the free weekend. You can tell because they’re making obvious. Even the campers are complaining because they’re getting caught more than usual
Free weekend and as usual, a wave of game cheaters appeared testing illegal software (for them it's a holiday)
I was wondering about this... In the game menus there is BF6 Free Trial section that appears to restrict to three game modes. Obliteration, All-out Warfare, and Casual Breakthrough.
Are these game modes isolated to the free trial subscribers, separated from people who own the game or are they all mixed in? The reason I ask is, I have not noticed an influx of lower-level players during my matches. I am not disagreeing with the claims but just posing the structure of matchmaking.
This is true. There are more in casuals then pubs. To the point its actually noticeable. I'm not the best player I make alot of mistakes and I play solo.
Casuals I play the most and you know how the bots Lazer you so fast the cronus zen players do the same. I have only seen the cronus zen players and bots kill like that. Now aimbot and wall hacks I have only ran into 1 in casuals but the zen is every where.
Think about it how many times have you been killed by a controller player when you are in full sprint vaulting and the console player lands perfect shots 50m out with a m24l full send.
I have 980h in this game mastered 80% of the weapons.I know no life. But I'm just saying I know. And casuals in there they are easy to find. Maybe because they are not really that good even with it most are bad anyway
I can tell they update the cronus zen recoil scripts because right after the recoil nerf I seen cronus zen players shooting the ground or walls. But now it's back to Lazer beams.
Like they still use the slow controller aim but once they ADS that snap in unrealistic. Not to mention it locks on through smoke and some breakable coverage.
I will admit the anti cheat is working really well on stop the PC cheating haven't seen a full on PC cheat in weeks. But the anti cheat is not stop the cronus zen UPDATED. FACT
and judging by yours, you never add anything of value to a conversation, much like your post.
Free weekend and as usual, a wave of game cheaters appeared testing illegal software (for them it's a holiday), for the average player it will be a traumatic time - it has always been like this, so it's worth playing something else for this "free weekend", put Battlefield 6 aside, so as not to be upset that every game a new cheater will appear and ruin the fun for everyone.
"I see more sus players in Casual BT that I do the other game modes. Maybe its for testing and tuning their cheat/cronus or maybe with bots, there are less people who will send a report?" I agree completely.
I see more sus players in Casual BT that I do the other game modes. Maybe its for testing and tuning their cheat/cronus or maybe with bots, there are less people who will send a report? I've seen some pretty crazy numbers similar to 120+ and the EOR results for them say "128 kills with assault rifles." 🤔 Just this week I watched someone start a Casual BT match at level 13 and topped the boards with this 120+ and obtained 4 levels for the duration of the entire match, which was around 15 minutes. That's some crazy SPM.
Are bots dumb? Yes. Are they predictable? Yes. But is racking up that many kills in a short amount of time also sus? Yes. Bots are also tuned terminators that will beam you through smoke, soft cover, and through small gaps in environment. I was absolute deleted by a bot through a narrow space between a door and the wall that just so happened to line up perfectly for them and the DMR they were using. Sure, a player can do that too but players have to follow the rules set for them as players.
When I decide to do a normal BT or CQ match, the KDR and SPM for everyone drops like a rock and normalizes, including myself. If my KDR and W/L ration drops proportionately and falls within the average range of the players where its not a casual match, then I consider that the baseline. In Casual BT if I have a 60/20 KDR and I drop to a 25/15 KDR and I am within the top 10, that seems normal. Players behave differently than bots. Enough time in these modes and you will start to spot the gaps in skill and behaviors. More times have I seen players make somewhat unreasonable maneuvers or plays that you don't see a lot of in the normal game modes.
Since there is no mechanism other than reporting through the match and waiting for AI to make a decision, that's all you can do. If you suspect at any level, report them. They won't know it, you won't know if they get banned. I am sure the anonymous approach is what EA had in mind. The problem with a lack of some sort of transparency is that it doesn't improve the trust in the anticheat.
