M&K Stinks can't compete against Controllers in BF6 - Very Disappointing

As a  MNIK player, you don't matter.  According to EA/Dice and all controller players, you have an unfair advantage...which is odd because there are many players that will ONLY play with a controller..when they can play with MNK on their consoles.  that tells me that they won't play with MNK on console because they KNOW they have an advantage...yet will say that they don't;

This game is trash...programmed by people that only play on controller on console.  If they played with MNK, they would likely try to make the game equal.  However, I'm inclined to believe that the devs are controller players playing on console....if they even play this game.

I feel for you Whiteknight-US-​ because it is unfair to MNK players.  It's true...you can't compete because controllers have an insane amount of aim assist, no/low bloom, no/low recoil, and can shot with laser precision through smoke, etc.

My God!!!! EA/Dice, how stupid are you?  Surely you can see the disparity.  If not, then you are blind and stupid?  Please explain to us MNK players how this is fair?  Are you that sick that you don't care?  Are you so against MNK players that you don't care?

When do we see fairness for this game?

I'm so disappointed in the complete lack of fairness you fail to offer to ALL players. How f'ing dare you!!!

Shame, shame, shame!

Imo the game wasn’t developed for pc, it was developed with the idea that if it works on consoles, it will work on pc. That’s why imo it’s plays so much worse than previous titles. There are a lot of things wrong with this game, no crossplay for pc users only is just the tip of the iceberg unfortunately.

I agree with the choice of disabling crossplay is pretty lame. Also agree with that flying is not that intuitive with M&K.
On the other hand, I haven't had an issue against any controller players. All my buddies and I have remained at the top of EVERY single game consistently and make controller players quit/rage.

Not only do controller players get aim assist but ALL THEIR GUNS HAVE 25% LESS RECOIL. Let that sink in on how brain dead controller aim is now.

I will ignore console getting aim assist, because I think that it is necessary to make a shooting game feel smooth on console.
Let me list everything that isn't ok though.

Consolebots get reduced bloom, which translates into better accuracy at range.  In play, this loosely translates into the consolebot being 25% more likely to land their shots at range, when both players are using the exact same weapon/loadout.

Consolebots get reduced recoil, and that doesn't mean only vertical recoil, they enjoy less horizontal recoil as well.  Again, in play, this loosely translates to console bots landing more of their hits at range, same gun/attachments etc.

Consolebots enjoy a smoother connection to the servers since the game was made to run for console with PC as an afterthough.  In play, this translates to more "behind cover" deaths, and they are more likely to win an engagement even if both parties react at the same time since the server will delete the damage from the player the server has already decided is dead.  In other terms, the server accepts that the console players version of he killed you faster than it accepts your version of you killed him, and then deletes your damage once it accepts he killed you.  Inept level of netcode design on this choice.

Due to the aim assist, console bots have smoother tracking on vehicle weapons.  In BF6, all vehicle movement gets directly translated to the players reticle.  For console, this movement is countered by the aim assist.  For PC, basically, **bleep** you.  MANY games level vertical movement, or rather the vertical movement of the vehicle is NOT translated to the players reticle.  This does not exist in BF6.

I also FIRMLY believe that consoles receive projectile guided assistance.  What I mean here is that unlike aim assist, which will help guide your reticle to the target, the game will instead guide your projectile to what it thinks is the intended target, even if the reticle is not on target.  Watching gameplay from console bots I feel confirms my theory.  

I also have a fringe theory that consoles receive a bonus to explosive ranges, and maybe damage.  It should be obvious why that sounds like BS, however every time an IFV kills me behind a tank by shooting the front of the tank it's a console bot 90% of the time.  

ALL of this could be dealt with by just letting PC turn off crossplay.  All of these posts and players like me who rant and rave about how it's all BS... and it's just one single tiny little pointless option that should have 0 consequence.  There is 0 argument for why we should be forced to play crossplay, EA has NEVER explained why it's forced... blarg.  Just blarg.

Multiple battlefield titles have had aim assist for controllers. You even get aim assist if you use a controller with a pc. Not the console players fault BF6 sucks at patching errors they caused.

I have a serious problem against controller users and their "advantages." You may not have an issue being in a squad with 3 others who are at a similar level. Play a about 20-30 games solo and then tell me how you feel.

You've hit it right on the head. I'm so sick of having to play with these **bleep** aim assist **bleep**. It's ridiculous that we can't turn that **bleep** off. I have close to 500 hours in this game and I'm finished with this POS that allows console **bleep** to turn the **bleep** off but not PC players. I'm sick of seeing low rank console players 10/1 kill/death ration in every **bleep** match. IT'S **bleep**! **bleep** DICE and whoever else thought this crap was a good idea. I'm done.

YEAH RIGHT. I'm sure of that. smdh

What difference does it make about how I feel if against controller players if I have squad members or not? Why would it change if I still beat the controller players easily? The feeling remains the same since that is what I experience. I have played many games solo and still remain on top. If your talking about team balancing, that is a separate issue.