Forum Discussion
I know, and often join in on hating BF6. But not only is it the best current option for a shooter that isn't too complex, or too simple. The only reason it feels so bad is because BF3 and 4 were just that good. The best question here really is "Why didn't you guys just copy 90% of that, with new maps and weapons?"
People bringing up the CEO bonus. It should also be noted that part of that bonus was due to implementing an AI strategy.
But BF6 isn't made using AI guys, we promise.
Maybe they should use that AI to figure out how to make the game more like BF4. Clearly they don't listen to the long time players, instead they choose to focus on the whales who play the game for 2 hours a week but buy everything in the store.
I think Battlefield Studios should return to days of Refractor era games. Make game first for PC and then do console optimisation. And this is coming from PlayStation gamer who has been with series since 2010. I, and I believe, many others want a proper successor of Battlefield 2 to come out.