Forum Discussion
#nailedit
I played the most epic match this morning on Golmund, 3200 tickets, back and forth for two hours, we won by 11 tickets. Even at the ripe old age of 8, (ancient for a video game) BF4 still offers the best and well balanced gameplay with a YUGE player base that plays daily. EA and DICE really need to look at the success and longevity of BF4, and find a way to implement that formula into BF6. I preordered 1 and V. and those were both epic disappointment and got shelved fairly quickly. Heck, I can still find a couple of servers playing BC2, and that game is is almost "Antikythera device" old in video game terms. Cheers.
No doubt if they showed up with BF4 level gameplay but say with 128 players, BF6 will put Battlefield back on the map.
If they stubbornly continue down the path laid out by BF1 and BFV, it's not going to go well.
I didn't pre-order either 1 or V. I played TitanFall 2 instead of 1. The beta for 1 and it's heavy sniper map turned me off. I got V on sale for 50% off back when they added the Greek maps, then never played it lol!!! I played the beta a good bit. Gunplay was fun, but almost no vehicle presence. I can excuse a WW1 setting, not a WW2 setting.
- 5 years ago
@ArchAngeL-PCXYeah, thanks to BF1, I got really good with my Monarch Titan, too. BF4 is the only game is can play for hours at a time, there's always so much going on, and even after thousands of hours, it rarely ever feels stale or past it's prime. Lately theres been lots of new players , which bodes well if 6 goes in the right direction. I already expect a rocky launch, some balance issues, and servers crashing because that's always been a battlefield tradition.
About Battlefield Franchise Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 17 minutes ago
- 22 minutes ago
- 6 hours ago