Battlelog Ban Appeal

So appealing just means that the ban was placed incorrectly and not an appeal for the reason? That makes no seanse. When a person appeals they want entire review of the whole thing not wether or not the proper procedure was followed. Ive noticed that stupid suspensions are being given. I got suspended for Alleged hate speech even though it wasnt and the alleged post doesnt actually clearly violate the ToS. In other words they'll ban you, cite the ToS, then not give a crap.

>With that said, I have taken a look into the matter and the response you have received is not only informing you of the reason for the ban, but the appeal itself is being denied on the grounds that the ban was correct in its application.

And this is exactly the problem i have.

Usually when you write an appeal you know which rules you broke/ why you were banned, you dont write an appeal and dispute the reasons or the rule framework. Asking for an appeal is asking for an unban i.e. a second chance in spite of the broken rules (and usually, in real life (shortening the time in jail or no jail at all), they are granted if you are remorseful.)

Why bother make an appeal system if appeals arent accepted?