@The_BERG_366 wrote:Maybe for you, but lots of people would disagree. So what it all boils down to is YOU wanting to play the game and therefore ea has to revive the game so that YOU can enjoy it more. 😉
Actually it seems that EA/DICE shouldn't bother because YOU are not bothered.
I would suggest that the 1000's of players that still play BF1 regularly would love new content for it.
That said, most know that it will never happen so OP is on a lost cause.
@Mo3tazibrahim i`ll have to agree with both of you. Content would be nice, but no company will invest developers(money) in a game that won`t generate any new income(doubt the battlepacks generate anything at this point).
The only thing that makes sense to hope right now, is them having assigned some people to keep the medals/skins/operation campaign rotation ongoing flawlessly and also taking care of reports. These are things that drive people away, I didn`t play for about 1 month while waiting for some bans and my last game was about 3w ago, when I had to get some scraps for a skin I didn`t have
Where EA/DICE do have to be careful is where if they can't even fix a simple thing like a weekly skin rotation updating as it should then how can they do something far more complex and produce a whole new game like BF6? Surely there are some economics there. It's a demonstration of faith and trust. I'm not sure I trust BF6 to be what it should be based on how BF1 is currently supported. Perhaps I'm in the minority on this chain of thought?
@KBAYSTSBwell, of course. Most of the developers are moved to the new game, few stay on maintaining the remaining games playable. Weapons rotations and stuff like that are not really a game breaker thing, so i guess that`s why nobody is rushing to fix it. They had it working for few years, I have no idea what could have destroyed it so bad that it takes weeks to fix.
