Forum Discussion
+1 to this. Either the grades are frozen or the weights they use to determine the grade make them essentially fixed. Teams with a poor historical winning percentage at home are unable to bump that percentage up quickly, and since teams with a mid-size stadium have fixed capacity... You are essentially stuck with a poor stadium atmosphere rating. Feels overly harsh for mid-size schools or turning around historically bad programs, and way too generous for big schools that have a bad run of seasons.
- tripleB20209 days agoSeasoned Newcomer
It doesn’t even have anything to do with historically poor win percentage. I took over at Delaware with no record of anything, now have an 88% home win % including a 20-game home win streak and it’s still an F.
- Zympothetic8 days agoSeasoned Newcomer
Yeah it has nothing to do with the weighted metrics the team rankings literally do not change regardless of team, prestige, w/l, ect the team at 7 could lose 100 straight games and still be 7 in stadium rank. As I stated in the OP i have been deep into a dynasty run this year with teams in the top 25 in stadium rank become literally irrelevant schools 2* jobbers and stay at the same spot they were when the dynasty started.
- Lyonzheart7 days agoRising Novice
Good to know!
About College Football 26 Bug Reports
Recent Discussions
- 2 hours ago