Playing time deal breakers

Numerous times I’ve had a player second in the depth chart that’s going to start next year because the senior in front of them is graduating transfer out because of playing time. Makes no sense.

also I’ve had juniors/ sophomores who are starters transfer out  due to playing time because a freshman gets signed which makes no sense either. 

also juniors/ seniors many times show as an F playing time rating when they’re 95 + and are starters but have a stacked depth chart behind them. Again makes no sense as they’re the starter.

A sophomore/freshman will transfer when they’re second in the depth chart if there’s a highly rated junior ahead of them even if that junior declares for the draft… I’ve lost numerous juniors to the draft and all the depth chart behind them because of this.

lastly you can go the entire season and sign a whole draft class and players won’t show up as being at risk for transferring due to playing time BUT the week that you advance to “players leaving”, all sorts of new players come out of the woodwork that are leaving due to playing time. There is no way to counter this except for spend coach points but I would prefer to be able to get these players reps during the year if I knew that playing time was a problem.

I manually upgrade my players so their overall rating doesn’t increase until training results the following year so their overall shouldn’t impact their dynamic deal breakers.