Challenge matches
Challenge matches are no longer a challenge, they're just a bloodbath. Total units adding up for 7 units was 47 vs 71. The sad part is this is a normal day-to-day occurrence with very little deviati...
Forum Discussion
@OldskewlcandcWhat do you loose with a challenge match? (nothing but maybe 3 minutes) Do you get extra money/XP for lost boosted challenge matches? (Yes) Can you progress with non-challenge matches? (Yes) Do you receive daily bonuses if you lose a challenge match? (yes) Do you receive bounties? (Yes)
TegliG : I do not know about others but to me the experience counts very much. When you experience an unfair game play, does the game consider to be good. I have played every pc version of C&C and none is even close to being bad as this Rival. The feeling is very much like betting on baccarat table but the results is skewed in different situation instead of random results (luck). After playing this game for close to 1 year, I can say that skills only contribute 50% to the winning factor. It’s all determine by how often you pay and the number of times you play per day. I hv stop playing for some time and then resume playing, my winning ratio increases by a lot. I even hv many matches where I just launch my harvester and I am declare a winner.
- @totorodc12345 I do not think there is any game in which you can be the best from the first match. Training, learning the meta, analysing past games. This is what counts, not the amount of money you spend on the game. The best rival players on the top of the ladder are free to play gamers.
What are you talking about ?? We are saying that this game sucks due to poor game experience as many players felt that the game is not being fair as matching is badly done. So don’t give unrelated response here. When did anyone ask to be the best in first match here ??? If you cannot accept genuine feedback on this game like this then I would kindly suggest that you do not comment further that is unrelated. Am not here to make enemies, but it’s just that there are many seasoned commenters here that sounded very very much like EA paid/unpaid people. I hv been monitoring this bunch for almost a year and I am very convinced these are not the normal gamers but are somehow affiliated with EA either direct/indirectly. And am fed up with these people giving half truth advice and misleading the new gamers to Rivals. :<
@totorodc12345 wrote:What are you talking about ?? We are saying that this game sucks due to poor game experience as many players felt that the game is not being fair as matching is badly done. So don’t give unrelated response here. When did anyone ask to be the best in first match here ??? If you cannot accept genuine feedback on this game like this then I would kindly suggest that you do not comment further that is unrelated. Am not here to make enemies, but it’s just that there are many seasoned commenters here that sounded very very much like EA paid/unpaid people. I hv been monitoring this bunch for almost a year and I am very convinced these are not the normal gamers but are somehow affiliated with EA either direct/indirectly. And am fed up with these people giving half truth advice and misleading the new gamers to Rivals. :<
You are being delusional. Do you actually think that a paid EA staffer will tell you that? If I was, I would get fired for telling you that. As far as the game sucking because you are losing, post a screenshot of your battles. I bet you won’t because I will without a doubt tell you why you lost just by looking at your deck and pointing out it’s weakness.
For example, I face players all the time that do not use rifleman, militants, dogs, or wheels. Without those, you are at a disadvantage in the early game and will almost certainly lose the first missile unless your opponent is another one that doesn’t know how important those are.
Another thing I see is players relying on flame and shock troops to clear infantry each and every time. Those are expensive. You can do the same with 10 Tiberium rifleman or dogs or wheels.. Those flames and shocks should only be used against cyborgs and zone troopers. You have to smartly use Tiberium trade offs in your favor. It makes no sense to send a 60 Tiberium Flame trooper against a 20 Tiberium missile trooper. Because once you do, a 30 Tiberium Buggy, Helicopter or a 10 Tiberium Dog or Wheel will kill it. Do the math. If you keep making bad trades like that, your opponent will get to tech much faster than you and overwhelm you.
The same goes with players that do not have pit bulls or bikes in their deck. Once that chembuggy or helicopter comes out, you have nothing to counter it unless you get to tech.
Most bad players have decks like this. One or two infantry followed by the rest being expensive tech units that they cannot get out. You need a balanced deck.
