Forum Discussion
11 Replies
- mrtnptrs6 years agoSeasoned Ace
@WarrenKWoodhouseFirst of, it is up to EA what it wants to do with the Command and Conquer website. So, they don't have to accept anything you say or do anything that you want them to do. Some of your suggestions are good, but not all of them. Do you know btw that the community also made a nice CNC-wiki? See here: https://cnc.gamepedia.com/Command_%26_Conquer_Wiki
EA DICE LA of course can't be referenced as one of the original authors of the CNC-games, because it is a studio that existed only AFTER the last CNC-game released. Also, only a few programmers that are working there have probably been part of EA pacific/LA/Westwood as most of them have left EA. So, referencing them in general would be weird. They could really extend the history part and could maybe add the name of the studio who worked at each game to the description to each game, but that would only take up space on the site. So, I would recommend them to either make a whole history-part on the site or just not referencing the developers at all. And it seems like no one is really agreeing with you on this, so it would actually be nice if you could not ask it for the seventh time.... haha I agree with that EA misses maybe one or two CNC game on their page, but also referencing all of the expansion packs might me a bit much on the minimalistic site they have nowadays for CNC.
I don't know detailed info on Westwood, but I'm sure Google can help you with this.... Really nice that you are making a map of game developers world-wide. Can we already look at what you added to that map so far? 🙂
About Command & Conquer Franchise Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 2 days ago
- 11 days ago
- 13 days ago