After four months of play I have decided this game is trash. The lack of transparency in game, like no chat lobby and suspiciously low number of “top” players leads me to conclude, that it’s basically fraud...certain individuals are dropping frame rates, to gain advantages,causing timer glitches with lag a whole host of issues with this game...there is no fixing the cheap feel of this game either..bots in the beginning assure you of fast promotion...then they place “real” players in the mix....funny I have done some math there is no way a person can have over 21 or 22 win streak, because streaks don’t count above masters3...of course battalia is going to retort...with some ea supportive or redwood supporting statement...also certain individuals have padded medal counts some devs have helped in this process through discord.

@governer7778 wrote:The lack of transparency in game, like no chat lobby [...]Yeah I also want to chat with others...@governer7778 wrote:suspiciously low number of “top” players [...]Some aren't good, some don't want to reach tib league (imagine fighting lvl 15 units, yikes).@governer7778 wrote:certain individuals are dropping frame rates, to gain advantages,causing timer glitches with lag a whole host of issues with this game..You mean like cheaters? I personally haven't seen any. But the framerate sometimes drops, yes. But thats because of my phone overheating :P@governer7778 wrote:.funny I have done some math there is no way a person can have over 21 or 22 win streak, because streaks don’t count above masters3 [...]Ehh... (Yes they don't count, but they are still being recorded, like if you win 3 in a row in masters it won't give you extra medals, but it will be noted on the activity tab. So a high winstreak is possible, but kinda useless( in masters and above).)@governer7778 wrote:of course battalia is going to retort...We all know he will x)@governer7778 wrote:also certain individuals have padded medal counts some devs have helped in this process through discord. Honestly, I don't care about that one.

Not only the concept is good, but so is the game itself. The GIGANTIC problem here is...THE PAY TO WIN!!The levelingsystem is not healthy for a F2P game. I have once played a game called Brickforce (when I was a small kid xd ) and it was P2W in every aspect, you can't even imagine it... but behind all of that P2W, there was a good game! Just too bad that the playerbase quit since you had to grind FOREVER to get something you really wanted. The game killed itself with its P2W bs. I don't want that Rivals ends the same way...Instead of the leveling sytsem, give us cosmetics! Skins for my tanks! Special animations for my basilisk attack! Bring us emotes! I would actually PAY for that! Let me visually customize my base more! Look at League, look at Fortnite! 0 P2W, makes TONS of money only with cosmetics! If you buy them, you win ( you look better ) and you don't get a gameplay advantage. So its a win (you) - win (others) - win! (the devs!) But with P2W, you win, devs win... but others loose. The loosers become frustrated. Then they quit.Basically, we have the potential for maybe one of the best mobile games here... but the aspect of P2W is just ruining it.The devs have 2 options: remove P2W and implement skins, this way everyone pays a little for the one/two skins they want and everyone is happy and the game continues to exist and the reputation of EA increases. Or... stick with the P2W. Instead of everyone paying a bit, you have only a handfull of people who pay too much because they can't control themselfes. And the ones not paying aren't happy. And the game dies. And the reputation of EA, once again. Decreases.Save the game.

Can someone alone answer both questions? Shaping two opposite opinions at the same time will be interesting.

i rly like the game, the mechanics are fine the balancing is mostly ok. its enjoyable unless u have to play against a enemy with higher unitlvls which * up the balancing and makes the game a * show. p2w mechanics make this overall good game trash. u cant can't even invest 100€ and hit a spot where u are not outmatched wich makes the game absolut garbage because its not a full price title. its a small game worth max 50€ but if u want to compete u have to pay at least 1000€ to be even near the highest lvl's and they are not even near max lvl.GOOD but TRASH because EA.

This game is trash | EA Forums

24 Replies

totorodc12345
7 years ago
I can re-affirm that this game is really trash mainly on the way it does matching. I regretted paying for this game. Seriously this game is so screwed that whatever level u r at, they will just match you with some opponents 1-2 level up. Always. Unless you really p2w all the way, which means paying non stop till you out pay opponents as well where you pay to rise above the level of the top few %. Only then you get to get a better matching. EA folks, you have just killed this game. At least for me for now. Am sure many others feel the same. I will play a few more rounds and probably uninstall in the near term.
‘For those who still defend this game, it’s either you are ignorant, complicit with EA, or are directly an EA team members. Don’t pretend to act like you are one of the players and have another account to give comments that try to divert attention. I am pretty unhappy and regretted paying thinking that EA folks would really fix the thing with the fix release. How naive I was to think this way.
totorodc12345
7 years ago
Reaperising - if you really think playing this game is really about being good or bad at the game, you might be missing the big picture. Assuming you have 1 knife, the opponent have a tank...how good can you be to fight the tank. If you still think this way, you are surely an EA staff. If you r not, then something is very wrong some where with you.
lastreconcile
7 years ago
Harvesters costing even 10 tiberium would cause players behind in a game after losing one a huge toll in trying to come back from a tilted match.
EinarThePillager
Seasoned Ace
7 years ago
@totorodc12345 wrote:
Reaperising - if you really think playing this game is really about being good or bad at the game, you might be missing the big picture. Assuming you have 1 knife, the opponent have a tank...how good can you be to fight the tank. If you still think this way, you are surely an EA staff. If you r not, then something is very wrong some where with you.
Being sarcastic with it, I'd say get close to the tank and jam its thread with the knife, otherwise you look like a rat trying to bite a tiger. Right now the game is unbalanced. There are some units that can easily dominate the field and have few counters and other units look like trash. Chem buggies are simply too OP for infantry and you can't just push out a predator/tick tank in time to counter one. There also seems to be a steep player distribution in the ranks, lots of novices on bronze to plat and pros on diamond to tiberium. Right now the master league can't be climbed due to the high amount of players competing to climb to the tiberium league. I'd rather stay on lower leagues goofing off to any players I find. First I'll grab and throw the nuke, then the 2nd and 3rd nuke is theirs, if they can stop me from harassing the harvester or having multiple cheap units gang up against their counter. Seen a hundred militants sacrifice themselves to a wolverine? Its worth a shot to befoul your opponent, like your just mocking him.

Forum Discussion

This game is trash

24 Replies

About Command & Conquer Franchise Discussion

Recent Discussions

C&C games - "Failed to launch game" error

CnC Generals asking to sign in to EA account

Red Alert 3 Uprising - Empire of The Rising Suns Campaign Bug

shockwave start problem

EA, please bring "Command & Conquer: The Ultimate Collection" to GOG.