Forum Discussion
@Mister_Crac wrote:
@xMaksuss wrote:Because why implement new features if they don‘t make any money?
Because you have honor and want to do your friggin' job right. That's why.
We are talking about EA here...
@xMaksuss wrote:We are talking about EA here...
Perhaps there is a little bit of common sense left in them still. Hope springs eternal!
- 7 years ago
@Mister_Crac wrote:
@xMaksuss wrote:We are talking about EA here...
Perhaps there is a little bit of common sense left in them still. Hope springs eternal!
I bet the devs do care about the game a lot and want to add more features. But the money hungry CEO of EA tell them what they can/cannot do. „Does a new feature bring us money? No? Well, guess you can‘t implement that!“
Remember C&C 3/Red Alert 3 (or C&C 4, yikes...)? EA rushed the poor devs. They had only about a year to finish the games. EA wants to collect money ASAP, quality is secondary priority. Blizzard for example doesn‘t do this. They give the devs as much time as they need. How long was Starcraft 2 in development? It was at least 5 years, and they didn‘t stop patching to this day. EA should focus on their customers more.
C&C 1 and Red Alert 1 remastered are on their way. Let‘s see if EA does things right this time...
- 7 years ago
@xMaksuss wrote:I bet the devs do care about the game a lot and want to add more features. But the money hungry CEO of EA tell them what they can/cannot do. „Does a new feature bring us money? No? Well, guess you can‘t implement that!“
I fear that this may be precisely what is happening ☹️
- EinarThePillager7 years agoSeasoned Ace
@xMaksuss wrote:I bet the devs do care about the game a lot and want to add more features. But the money hungry CEO of EA tell them what they can/cannot do. „Does a new feature bring us money? No? Well, guess you can‘t implement that!“
Remember C&C 3/Red Alert 3 (or C&C 4, yikes...)? EA rushed the poor devs. They had only about a year to finish the games. EA wants to collect money ASAP, quality is secondary priority. Blizzard for example doesn‘t do this. They give the devs as much time as they need. How long was Starcraft 2 in development? It was at least 5 years, and they didn‘t stop patching to this day. EA should focus on their customers more.
C&C 1 and Red Alert 1 remastered are on their way. Let‘s see if EA does things right this time...
For the sake of developers to earn money, we should help them so their task would not be money tight. I was thinking not on spending money for them but increasing the player base so at least 1% of all of us would fuel the money needed for the developers. I think the player base for Rivals is too small, we need players to stream their best wins and funniest defeats. I for one would do so if I have the skills and resources to stream my battles. Some of them are so stupid I could make my opponent laugh and roll of his chair! I was talking about either sending harvesters to try and launch the 1st nuke (and fail the 2nd and 3rd ones) or spamming the wrong units against their counters. Seen riflemen/militants march to their doom in front of a wolverine/widow-maker/chem buggy? I can't believe that those soldiers are obeying a commander who is so stupid that he thinks he can win by losing. Said commander would even show all his cards in his deck to his opponent, but there's a catch, 2 or 3 of the units are lies. If there is a cyber wheel, it might not even be in his deck.
About Command & Conquer Franchise Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 9 days ago
- 9 days ago