Forum Discussion
I know RA3 + EXP and T4 or Twillight weren't the best and to some extend not belong to the series, but I still wan't them remastered because I loved playing them because they still were good and to the spirit.
I mean look at other franchises such as Assassin's Creed, here unlike C&C the new ones Origin, Odessy and Now Valhalla all bear the name but are 100% not a AC game, the story are wrongs, the game style and way is wrong, its more a Dark Sould/Darksiders/Witcher type game with a AC title and thats it.
RA3 and TW might not fit story wise but at leas the rest is C&C, wrong name and story but correct in everything else and that to me is enough to warrent a remaster and to play again.
But I wouldn't mind a new RA3 and TW to play next to the remastered version but done better for us to enjoy.
If I was the guy handling the Script Writing for TT and RA3, I'd probably return to roots for both of them. Started together, end together.
CnCTD and RA1 both started from connected story lines, and thanks to Chrono Tech, diverged into the two worlds we know today. So, RA3 and CnCTT could of used them roots. Just an idea, it could easily have been done without the rejoining at the roots. If EA was that badly out of ideas, they could have returned to root on both story lines.
All I'm saying is, if they are going to remaster RA3 and CnCTT, they need to remake them and scrap the original scripts. They can keep the old Campaigns in there for the 'Remaster' sake of it, but create a new and improved story that actually makes sense in addition.
- 5 years ago
I rahter saw they remastered them, and then build a brand new version of them with the new improved story line and gameplay.
You know keep them sepereate to not confuse people, as I would still like to play the original flawed ones as is without changes to it lol.
But then again that might just be me.
- 5 years ago
I would be happy with an RA2 remaster.🙂