Forum Discussion
Even the desktop version of the Geforce 750 is below the recommended requirements.
What resolution are you running? Macs usually have high resolution displays, whereas you should try something in the range of 1600x900.
Thanks for the reply.
Any thoughts where I can get a comparison of the various chipsets?
On the EA website it list the Recommended graphic card as a GTX 660. My assumption was that the 750 was better. Even with the M. The GTX 660 looks to be a couple of years old.
- Anonymous11 years ago
There are many sites with benchmarking. The difference between a real (desktop) 650 and the desktop 750 is / was far smaller than the increase in performance between a desktop 650 and desktop 660. Laptops vary all over the place, depending on manufacturers, with only Sager giving you a good share of desktop performance with their gaming PCs.
Once upon a time, Toshiba laptops' GPUs werte "only" detuned about 15% compared to a desktop, while some other brands took off as much as 30% of performance. Here is how 750s of some varieties compare, desktop to laptop:
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-750-vs-GeForce-GT-750M-Mac
- Anonymous11 years ago
Hey, thanks for helping me with that. Really appreciate it.
I agree that there are a lot of varables, but I would have expected it to run a bit better based on this comparison.
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-660-vs-GeForce-GT-750M
The overall benchmarks are close to the 660 (6.5 vs. 5.5).
I'm a heavy gamer and this is the first game that is totally unplayable. My machine chews threw Shadows of Mordor and the new Borderlands.
Oh well.