Re: Ranked is a waste of time.
@dotazured wrote: (partial quote for succinct purposes)which isn't relevant in TT anyway) etc.
simple answer is let the TT Leaderboard be sorted into those who use assists and those who don't including Driving Line.
@dotazured wrote: (partial quote for succinct purposes) "So to argue that you get an competitive advantage is simply not truthful, a seasoned driver without assists would beat a driver on a controller with (with any level of assists) any day of the week."
Explain my results from last year! In F1 22 my Time Trials averaged top 14.73%. In a Weekly Event GP that compensated for assists used I finished in the top 1.47%.
@dotazured wrote: (partial quote for succinct purposes) "And regarding the racing line, if one isn't familiar enough with a track, one can just enable racing line until more proficient at said track, nobody is forcing you to not use it."
But I am being forced to compare my results to those who use assists, again, show me where in this game can I compare apples and apples?
@dotazured wrote: (partial quote for succinct purposes) "Are you seriously comparing competitive cheating with accessibility features and trying to argue that it is the same thing?"I drive with no assists and I think that being forced to race with someone who uses all assists, that person to me personally is cheating, yes. Not once have I compared competitive cheating with accessibility features, read the transcript.
@dotazured wrote: (partial quote for succinct purposes) "So you are doubling down here on your stance that actually cheating (actively modifying memory tables and grip values of the game with external tools) in a competitive setting is comparable with using the accessibility features in a game? Get real.
See above and read the transcript.