EA 25 Squad Battle 12 Match only!!!

@lansenyl I'm not great at the game, normally a div 5 rivals player, if I did do champs last year I only got a few wins.

This year I'm only playing squad battles and no I don't play the games on world class or legendary unless its a 60-70 rated squad, I'm happy with the rewards I get for my time.

I also fully respect if someone plays at higher difficulties then they deserve better rewards than me.

@lansenyl They did lower rivals and I asked them to do that.

People ask for more wl games. I don’t know how people played 40 of those.

People wanted tournaments but no rewards as that made it to sweaty.

The rewards are no different in squad battles rather you play 12 or 400 if you play them all. It’s not that the rewards are better it’s that a casual player can’t compete if it’s 7000 games even if someone plays at a lower difficulty.

Especially if you hate the game. You post in every thread about how much you dislike it and that’s all fine. You don’t even have the game so why should I play even 23 if that’s how you feel. It doesn’t make sense.

@R1ckyDaMan19 I'm not the greatest either but I managed to get div 2 in fc24 when the gameplay was at its best.

I only ever played as many online games as I had to and skipped rivals and champs for most of the year. I could easily play most of if not all my squad battle games on legendary or world class as long as the AI didn't have a meta squad.

But I find a 12 game format to be too be a little to competitive and just short. If you guys feel like fc24 had too many games I can understand where you're coming from because when I did play rivals and champs I never finished squad battles. I am not the only person who thinks that 12 games is not enough and 24 is a much better balance.

As for you @RadioShaqs,

I have not ever seen anyone ask for more champs games

Tournaments should be competitive and sweaty with great rewards

If we all had the exact same teams and tactics to play against every week then there wouldn't really be a difference in how many games we played because then there would be no RNG in the squad choices.

I hate the game because the developers make choices like this instead of working on making a fun football sim that actually improves on itself every year.

@lansenyl It’s harder to qualify with less games. You also have to play better players. That’s why they want more back plus people like wl.

I don’t see anyone asking for sweaty games. Casuals wanted gold tournaments back with barely any rewards that’s why they wanted those back.

Then again you don’t play the game so it really doesn’t affect you. I just find it odd you would want others to play more and you won’t even play one game.

@RadioShaqs It should be harder to qualify for online competitive matches though. That's the point of it being a competitive mode...

Tournaments should be 4 games and have different levels, gold, silver, bronze for simple coin and pack rewards and a special one they update monthly with new requirements and better random rewards. Id even pay coins or points to enter a tournament like that.

I've been playing these games for over 15 years so it does kind of affect me when I would like a decent football game to play but this studio doesn't seem to be trying anymore, and I've seen more than enough feedback from other platforms to feel like more feedback is required here because someone must be feeding the devs bad information. You may not want to play more matches in squad battles but there are people that do otherwise this post wouldn't exist.

Instead of saying no no no, come to a compromise and find a better balance than 12 matches every 7 days. Otherwise the mode could just be scrapped entirely for something better and more rewarding that can be done online or offline. (tournaments)

@lansenyl Depends how you look at it. Wl was about who could play more games kinda like how squad battles was too.

It probably makes more sense to reward the better player though like wl and squad battles both do this year.

Tell you what I think it’s fair I will meet you in the middle. You play 0 games a week I play 12 so 6 sounds like a fair compromise. Could make it 12 if you really felt like playing more.

@RadioShaqs You're prime EA material aren't you?

I'm not trying to start a problem with you but you seem to he starting one with me. I'm only suggesting the company you're volunteering your time for, find common ground with the community as a whole. Not common ground between me and you.

I just want the game to be better for everyone.

@lansenyl I don’t want to start anything with you either. That’s why I would meet you in the middle although I think 6 is pretty low.

I think we all want what’s best for the community which would be less games unless people like the game. I could see finding common ground for that and even making it 40.

@hbaset What’s the difference you need less wins now correct? That’s less games you need to play.