@TheFeves @TheFeves This is not a covert exploit you are attempting to justify - it is blatant false advertising. Your so-called "legal background" seems questionable, so allow me to clarify. False advertising occurs when a company makes misleading claims about its product, deceiving consumers into believing they are receiving something they are not. In this instance, EA advertised an "Icon 86+" in the pack description. You are correct that the term "hero" was included in the title, but that word doesn't mean anything, it means just as much as whatever they call the pack, legally, what matters is whether the advertised claims are fulfilled. The advertisement promised an "Icon 86+" with no explicit information indicating that players would receive a hero. You are conflating two entirely different issues. An exploit refers to taking advantage of a flaw or loophole in a system, which is not the case here. An example of an exploit would be if there was a bug that let you buy every pack for free, or a bug that let you buy someone from the transfer market without spending coins. So you are conflating two entirely different issues.
Instead of presenting irrelevant points and misusing your so-called "legal expertise," focus on addressing the actual problem. I understand that you might be upset because you did not receive your rival's rewards, and that is a valid concern as well. But please, do not oppose simply because you are not directly involved. That's childish.