Forum Discussion
Agree with what you are saying to some extent, Ronaldinho at ST is not really reallistic however he should be able to play inside forward LW/LM as it was one of his main role IRL, we shouldnt have to wait for an evo to use him that way, especially because we can only use this evo on one player only.
I think we can agree that forcing a player to play his position is fine (meaning if Ronaldinho has LW/CAM he can only play at his full potential there) but EA should let us use whatever role we want.
So going back to what I was complaining about, the middle ground could be to remove roles from player, it should only be a formation setting (just like "come back in defense" or "stay wide" in previous years) but a player has to stick to his position. That way we can still have some form a realism without being completely restricted by the roles that are attributed to a card.
I agree man 100%. These roles do complicate and limit you too much. I get why they put it in, but I don't think it's helpful. It eliminates you from playing potentially great cards because they're forcing you to use that card in a way that isn't ideal in game. Especially when they've made a game that is so meta forced it's almost impossible for 90% of the player base to not use the same tactics that everyone else is using.
I think by removing the role specific aspect from players, it'd actually free up the game to be more fluid and less meta based.
Good call bro.
About EA SPORTS FC™ 25 Ultimate Team
Recent Discussions
- 9 minutes ago
- 49 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 2 hours ago
- 3 hours ago