3-2-2-3 is not that simple to implement as it is only used during build-up irl, and then transition into a 4-4-2, 5-2-3 or 5-4-1 when defending....so if they add the formation you can build-up and attack, but then you will be forced to use that same formation when defending which will be a nightmare. Not to mention the complex positioning and inverted fullbacks and whatnot.
3-5-2 (or 3-5-1-1) is the closest as it is more balanced so maybe try it out.
It is an interesting idea though to use two formations separately for attack and defense. It would be nice to have that added in the game.
I agree about the attacking and defending formation, it's honestly basic stuff in football these days.
About my suggestion, they used to have 3421 formation with the two being LF and RF which doesn't really exist anymore. Sone they should just bring it back with CAMS. I'll deploy full back or wide midfields.
Thanks for the reply anyway dude
