Forum Discussion
To put it differently, there is indeed no contradiction between AI and player passing. However, AI passing in head-to-head matches is consistently poor, regardless of the player being used. On a separate note, I believe this issue is not solely attributed to AI performance but rather a mistake made by EA. Currently, a passing tendency of 3 yields the same passing rate as a passing tendency of 1, and a crossing tendency of 3 is equivalent to a crossing tendency of 1. In the past, passing in manager mode was already poor, but now it has worsened significantly. Considering these factors, do you still think it can be solely attributed to AI performance?
I comprehend and fully agree that some players may express the need for adjustments in AI passing to ensure fairness in H2H matches.
According to certain players, the adjusted passing system in H2H matches has inadvertently affected the passing mechanics in Manager mode, resulting in issues. Since the passing system is shared across all three modes, it raises the question: if there has been an overall passing change, why does the AI passing in H2H mode consistently outperform the AI passing in Manager mode, regardless of the player or tactics employed?
Additionally, if the passing system has undergone a systemic change, it should not be a matter of incorrect data representation. However, it seems that even when using a one-bar passing input, the resulting pass number remains the same as a three-bar pass. Moreover, the crossing tendency in Manager mode still appears to be higher with a one-bar crossing input compared to a three-bar crossing input.
About FC Mobile General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 8 hours ago
- 11 hours ago
- 20 hours ago