Multiplayer Balance Changes Feedback.
Having played some matches of multiplayer on the new patch, I can say it's mostly a step in the right direction. Here are my thoughts.
1. Gun Balance
(I change my stance on this. Aft...
Forum Discussion
Feedback? Sure.
Time was wasted balancing multiplayer instead of working on the tons of problems in the main game.
Just because you don't play it a lot, that doesn't mean other people don't. ME3 multiplayer was a hit with a lot of people and had a large community, safe to say it has one here too. Try and be respectful.
The Mattock is atrocious now. It was actually better before the patch. Now it's like a peashooter. Several clips to kill a mob in silver +
Dmg nerf was uncalled for
Are the devs/QA testing this in bronze or something?
These balance changes remind me of another space shooter (rhymes with Pestiny)
Where they were either nerfing stuff to the ground or shuffling different stats around to keep the guns on the same level
Please don't follow the same path
For a game with so many guns/characters you shouldn't need to rely on 3-5 weapons to have fun/be efficient in silver or gold
Bronze is ok.I think for the most part bronze is ok, but some things suck even in bronze. The carnifex for example. Post patch still takes almost a full clip to kill a raider (Rank 5). I think they should give buffs like fire rate, accuracy, and reload speed to guns and lower enemy health so bronze doesn't become a stomp fest. I wreck bronze, and some guns do indeed need damage buffs, but to keep the whole game balanced I think enemy health should be looked into.
