Re: Unfunny SAM - Good or Bad Idea?
@TKMcClone wrote:Edi had Joker and Shepard to help it develop, so joking seemed like a natural evolution. SAM has more responsibilities and direct connections to organic personalities (pathfinders). I prefer that it was more of a narrator than a participant in the story. To me, it fit well that SAM didn't have much personality. I think that it is 'too big' to have one personality.
Synthetics were done extremely well in ME1-3. It could even be argued that defining the rights of created beings was the core theme for the games. That is a lot for one (too big) Ai to live up to.
I think it would be an interesting exploration if SAM 'created' new Ai without permission. The implications and questions around 'synthetic reproduction' would become an extension of the ME1-3 "synthetics and morality" theme. SAMs child Ai could be given / linked to Ryder as a replacement while objections and suspicion lingered. It would be more interesting to see this smaller Ai develop a personality.
Lot of interesting ways they could go with SAM. Benefactor, theme, stand in or polar opposite for EDI, friend, foe, or symbiot... but I don't want the "bigness".☹️
At least for the first episode, SAM is more the protagonist than I am. I get to make some decisions and "drive"... but it is more than a little like sitting in Dad's lap and playing with the wheel. I'm okay with SAM being dad's favorite out of the three of us - but I want to play *me* in the game instead of SAM by proxy.