Forum Discussion
@IrishOwlif you think that removing the 25 season cap is a bad thing, then you must work for EA. You realize in 25 seasons you have NO WAY unless you sabotage yourself on purpose, to build, get old, rebuild, and go through all the real ups and down a franchise has, then you are going to add up to 48 teams a season and still only have 25 seasons? Its asinine. Your argument is that you would never buy a new one if it never ended? How about all the people that wont buy the new one because nothing has changed? You don't think that alienating the largest user base in the game is a recipe for disaster? (I am going off the fact that every year Franchise mode is the BIGGEST section of the Answer forum, but the most ignored as well.
I don't think its a bad thing, and no I don't work for EA. I am explaining to you way they don't do it.
Its all about the replay value. If they let you run a team forever, you'll never need to buy a new game unless you want new features.
Personally, I wouldn't play past 20 years. Doesn't mean I think its a bad thing, but I like a little realism in my games. The longest running GM, David Poile, stayed with the Predators for 21 years and then 15 with Washington. No one has ever served for more then 20ish years as a GM with a team. Ergo, I never play more then 20 years.
So, yes I don't get to see my last couple years of prospects grow, but I set the next GM up as best as I can, which is what IRL GMs do.
- Bahamuta3 years agoNew Ace@IrishOwl I get that real life GM's dont do it, but its a Video game. Honestly I would buy hockey every year if i could go past 25 seasons.you realistically cannot get a player that can come close to even touching most of gretzky's records until about 17-20 years in. It never fails i hit season 19-22 and i get a rookie in a draft that just blasts out 60 goals a season from the jump and its like WTF. I have had perfect created players get drafted as far as you can get them in the draft (i think 4 years in) and NEVER come even remotely close to touching records. I mean if they want me to change my GM name to go past 25 years fine, in NHL 21 and NHL 22 (which i only bought because i wanted the Kraken since I live in seattle). I have done probably 25-35 different 25 season franchises. It gets * old starting over constantly, i want to get to a point where I can see the league without all of today's draft picks still there. I hit my 25 year and still had drafted players with faces in the league. Like give me a break, i want to go beyond what todays NHL looks like. I create my own stories in my head with players, etc. But its hard to maintain the "narrative" when you have to start over constantly.
- 3 years ago
I understand what you are saying, but nonetheless, marketing managers don't see it as you do. They need to set limitations, or at least feel the need to to ensure what they want.
I get you are trying to explain you point as far as your wants, but remember, that EA is in the business of making money, and this helps ensure that people that would never buy a new game, have to buy one
I'm not trying to argue with you, just pointing out the logic behind their refusal. I understand you don't like that, which is why every year you and @heavydutyrammer beg for these things. I'm not saying stop, just merely answering your questions becuasr EA won't answer them for you. The last thing they want to do is go on record why they won't meet your needs. Its the same reason they won't make an official statement as to why the removed editing players. It would be a PR nightmare if they told gamers they don't trust them.
- 3 years ago
EA PLS just patch in multi team control. For the love of god.
About NHL 23
Recent Discussions
- 17 days ago
- 24 days ago
- 3 months ago
- 3 months ago
- 4 months ago