REBOUNDS
NHL 22 1/2 rebounds edition is literally what this game is has become...you play PERFECT DEFENSE and all they have to do is shoot a floater and the goalie doesn't know how to kick the puck to the cor...
Forum Discussion
Rebounds have been broken for years. Either the physics don't make sense or the play the AI goalie makes on it doesn't make sense.
Rebounds aren't physics based in EA NHL games and never have been. Pucks always have a destination, based on player attributes. That is why there are no loose pucks, and why you have a better chance at scoring off a rebound off a slow shot from the corner than from a hard slapshot from the point.
@Jagavekov wrote:Rebounds aren't physics based in EA NHL games and never have been. Pucks always have a destination, based on player attributes. That is why there are no loose pucks, and why you have a better chance at scoring off a rebound off a slow shot from the corner than from a hard slapshot from the point.
I don't agree that pucks have a pre-determined destination based on player attributes. I do agree, however, that there is a pre-determined path.
I believe, regarding rebounds, that pucks always bounce to certain areas because that's how EA has programmed the 'physics' off of the goalie pad. It appears to me, that the rebounds have 3-4 pre-determined angles coming off the pads. EA has programmed the offensive A.I. to also be in those locations, so that's why the rebounds always tend to land right on the tape of the eventual scoring player.
@KidShowtime1867 wrote:
@Jagavekov wrote:Rebounds aren't physics based in EA NHL games and never have been. Pucks always have a destination, based on player attributes. That is why there are no loose pucks, and why you have a better chance at scoring off a rebound off a slow shot from the corner than from a hard slapshot from the point.
I don't agree that pucks have a pre-determined destination based on player attributes. I do agree, however, that there is a pre-determined path.
I believe, regarding rebounds, that pucks always bounce to certain areas because that's how EA has programmed the 'physics' off of the goalie pad. It appears to me, that the rebounds have 3-4 pre-determined angles coming off the pads. EA has programmed the offensive A.I. to also be in those locations, so that's why the rebounds always tend to land right on the tape of the eventual scoring player.
That very well may be the case. I just know it isn't physics based from all the hours I have played the game over the years.
Rebounds in the 2k games felt way more organic and unpredictable, and why there were actually scrambles to get to loose pucks in the slot.
EA_AljoCommunity Manager
@Jagavekov wrote:
Rebounds aren't physics based in EA NHL games and never have been. Pucks always have a destination, based on player attributes. That is why there are no loose pucks, and why you have a better chance at scoring off a rebound off a slow shot from the corner than from a hard slapshot from the point.
Nothing is pre-determined.
While I agree that rebounds can be an easier way to score, setting your D strategies to collapsing and protect net will help keep your players in better position for gathering up rebounds.
- @EA_Aljo so why do rebounds always seem to find sticks? I'd say well over 75% of rebounds end up on somebody's stick immediately. I should do a test to verify this. Do a tally of rebounds that don't get absorbed by the goalie and how many go into loose areas when surrounded by players vs to players. It sure seems as if the goalies are hell bent on kicking the puck to where that solo forward in no man's land tends to be. He could be 90 degrees to the goalie and he'll find a way to wait to a kick his skate out to perfectly deflect it to him.
