Forum Discussion
16 Replies
- Treatmentworke662 years agoSeasoned Ace@KidShowtime1867 Again I didn't do anything he stick lifed me
@Treatmentworke66 wrote:
@KidShowtime1867Again I didn't do anything he stick lifed meI'm 90% sure you're just trolling at this point.
Here's you initiating the tie-up:
Your player model morphs here, likely due to the boards being so close, but the outcome is the same, a tie up:
- Treatmentworke662 years agoSeasoned Ace@KidShowtime1867 And the one with the bread man he tried checking me so I reversed hit as I was passing the puck
- Treatmentworke662 years agoSeasoned Ace@KidShowtime1867 At this point you must be trolling because again I didn't do anything because he stick lifted me
- Treatmentworke662 years agoSeasoned Ace@Treatmentworke66 Just because you have a blue banner doesn't mean you know everything about this game
- thebrazenhead752 years agoNew Hotshot
The first clip shouldn’t be a penalty. It was just as the player was losing (or attempting to pass) the puck. It was clearly within the allowed time frame to hit a player after losing possession.
The second clip shouldn’t be a penalty. If anything it should be on #22 TML player for interference. After the pass was clearly made #22 skated into him and lost balance probably due to lack of balance, strength, etc.
If the first clip is a penalty for making contact with a player without possession of the puck then in the second clip it should be a penalty on #22 for making contact with a player without possession of the puck.
The third clip should be a penalty. It’s clearly obstruction by not allowing the player to move.
About NHL 24 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
NHL 25 on PS4 and PS5
Solved7 days ago