Forum Discussion
They currently have in place. The goal is under review. They get that wrong more than half the time. Putting in a challenge would just compound the issue. If the AI varies in its interpretation of a goal non goal. Where do you think that decision would go with a coach's challenge. Right back to the AI interpretation.
- Gswizard779 months agoRising Rookie
dogheels I do agree with your statement but the is a “challenge control” in the goalie controls
- dogheels1 month agoSeasoned Ace
I understand your point of there being one. But like i said. This game and the decisions are pre orchestrated. Its the same how the AI controls the players on your team, that you are not controlling. Completely different how the AI team is controlled. And as for a challenge. Who decides the right or wrong call. The AI cant even get penalties called right. As well as missed off sides and icing calls. How many times has your player been called for interference while scoring a goal. The player has full control of the puck but comes in contact with the goalie. How would the AI judge this. And we do see in the game, challenged goals by the ref as not being a goal, and then its over turned. Its a 50/50 shot at best. If the AI made the right call in the beginning. There would be no need for a challenge.