Forum Discussion
i live in US and Canada and hockey is huge here so. also the comparison for soccer and hockey isn't accurate. ive played soccer and hockey as a kid and made the WHLfor a minute in hockey. Soccer costed 500 to sign up yearly and 400 for equipment "Cleats, Shinguards, your team jerseys" hockey was the same sign up fee and like 800 bucks for equipment. saying it isn't popular is a bit shortsighted. if it wasn't popular there wouldn't be a game period. women's hockey has blown up too. also, the NHL draft has more players go undrafted yearly than mlb and NFL do. this has nothing to do with developing a game. if it was like i said. No EA NHL period. Yes, F1 is a global sport and had a major popularity spike thanks to Netflix but that doesn’t mean NHL lacks popularity. In Canada and the US NHL is one of the most followed and culturally embedded sports, and the EA NHL series is consistently a top-seller here. As for PC demand being a "vocal minority" the truth is, there’s been no serious effort to gauge that demand. Petitions don’t get visibility or EA support, and many fans have long given up because every year ends in silence or deflection. The conversation being “talked to death” isn’t proof of low interest—it’s proof of loyal fans constantly asking for clarity. You mention other studios not making hockey games as proof the market isn't there. But EA has held a tight grip on the market for decades, making it financially and strategically difficult for another major publisher to justify jumping in. That doesn’t mean there’s no audience it means EA has controlled the space. Finally, no one is saying it's cheap to do but if Madden, FC, and F1 can justify PC ports (despite having similar backend needs: anti-cheat, crossplay, patches, support), then NHL could too. Especially when EA already runs Frostbite based games on PC. We’re not asking for special treatment we’re asking to be acknowledged as a real player base. The growth of PC gaming since 2015 speaks for itself. All we want is transparency on whether EA ever intends to serve this audience.
Yes, hockey is huge in Canada. It's also huge in certain states in the US. Regardless, it's still the 5th most popular sport in North America. And out of that crowd, there's just not a large enough PC playerbase to support a PC release.
Soccer doesn't require ice and expensive gear though. You can literally go to a park, field, beach, etc. and the only required piece of equipment is a ball. This is what helps make it such a popular sport. Anyone can play it. Hockey requires a whole different level of skill with expensive gear to support it. Not everyone is going to have an old pair of skates and a frozen pond in their backyard.
We don't have a tight grip on the market. We're not in control of the hockey video game space. There is no exclusivity. Anyone can make a hockey game. They can also acquire the licensing from various leagues. We don't have exclusive rights. There is nothing stopping anyone else from making hockey video games. It's a very big project to take on though. This is a tremendously difficult sport to replicate authentically in a video game. Then add in licensing and costs skyrocket. So, chances are good other companies have realized the return on this doesn't make the investment in making one worth it.
Madden, F1 and FC have the playerbase to support PC releases. Hopefully, NHL will have that someday. We recognize there is a PC player community. It's just not one that is currently big enough to support the investment into a native PC game.