Balancing Going Viral
I'm not a Zombie player so I'm going to need input into this card. Let's look at the stats: - All zombies get +1/+1. - All zombies get +Frenzy. - Shuffle 3 Going Viral cards into your deck. - Dra...
Forum Discussion
No, I agree, I was just sitting the similarities in the arguments about cliques. And to me, they really we're somewhat equal in my eyes. Going viral was a bit more powerful in the right circumstances, but it also couldn't be played on turn one. They can both spiral ridiculously out of control.
Honestly, I think the game is in a decent spot. I've built a few different overall winning plant decks that are at least break even against the current zombie metas. To me that screams balance.
I just thought it was funny for zombie players to be using the same defences that plants used for cliques. They failed to see the downsides, much like plant players fail to see them with going viral, and realize with it that it takes a good draw and well built deck to get them to be overpowering, without acknowledging that the same was true for the other side.
Honestly, I think the game is in a decent spot. I've built a few different overall winning plant decks that are at least break even against the current zombie metas. To me that screams balance.
I just thought it was funny for zombie players to be using the same defences that plants used for cliques. They failed to see the downsides, much like plant players fail to see them with going viral, and realize with it that it takes a good draw and well built deck to get them to be overpowering, without acknowledging that the same was true for the other side.
That's not just the game though. The game reflects life, look how divided by beliefs so much of the world is, because both sides cannot imagine what it is like to be the other side. Sometimes the only thing that we have in common is enemies.
