Cheap Deck - Wall Knight
From what I've seen, most of the people around here are either on a low league, or have trouble creating decks. So, I've challenged myself to create a deck able to defeat Ultimate League players, bu...
Forum Discussion
This deck is actually bad. Aggro and Control decks can beat this.
I don't think this deck is good enough for rank players.
I'm not sure if you're deck is real even with proofs. There's too many players with decks that can beat this you know. You know how players made decks can beat this. This is the worse case against facing new players because this is not easy win.
have you ever play this deck on 20 matches to prove this? We wanna know what win rate really is on this deck?
You can't just show this as you're best deck. You should test its win rate before you prove it.
I....I dont think aggro does a lot against this. I personnally think 4 environments each is a /bit/ overkill and I really dislike water Chestnut but its a VERY cheap deck thats probably good. I would suggest to cut the Chestnuts and one Flytrap environment to play some Removal.... Shamrockets and Doomshrooms if available, maybe a lawnmower or hammer
also: dude....we got people here that claim they have spend 1000 bucks on the game and win every game with plants with a winrate around 20% with zombies... I am not sure if Winrates have an aweful lot of value in terms of representation
This deck is really bad as i have tried this now in 20 matches in ranked. This deck is 10% win rate.
This deck can be easily beaten by Silver League and Gold League with common deck. How is this deck even good in Ranked?
This deck isn't really good and ultimate fail for higher leagues.For someone who begs for others to make their deck work you are pretty quick to judge what works for others :/
@OldSchool9210 wrote:This deck is really bad as i have tried this now in 20 matches in ranked. This deck is 10% win rate.
This deck can be easily beaten by Silver League and Gold League with common deck. How is this deck even good in Ranked?
This deck isn't really good and ultimate fail for higher leagues.
Wow!You were able to play 20 ranked matches with this deck in 85 minutes!!!
That is seriously impressive!
@GrinningRuiner wrote:
@OldSchool9210 wrote:This deck is really bad as i have tried this now in 20 matches in ranked. This deck is 10% win rate.
This deck can be easily beaten by Silver League and Gold League with common deck. How is this deck even good in Ranked?
This deck isn't really good and ultimate fail for higher leagues.
Wow!You were able to play 20 ranked matches with this deck in 85 minutes!!!
That is seriously impressive!
It's easy when you just rage quit by round 3.
BPRD
This deck, as the name would suggest, is a deck I created mostly for new people who doesn't have many cards yet.
That's why I forced myself to not include any Super-Rare or Legendary, but this doesn't mean you HAVE to play this deck exactly as it is.
Let's say that this would be the SUPER cheap version of the "Heartichoke-Flytrap" deck, but without all the fancy cards like Jugger-Nut, 2nd best Taco, Astro Vera, etc.
Now, I know that the deck has some difficulties against other fancier decks, but that doesn't mean that this deck is bad overall.
I don't know it's exact winrate since I didn't kept track of all the matches, but I can assure you it is over 50%.
And yes, I think it CAN be played competitively (with a little bit of luck, I won't deny that).
I defeated 4 out of 8 Ultimate League players I faced.
If that is not good enough for you, I don't know what will.
