EA, PLEASE READ. DON'T KILL THE GAME.
Alright. Let me begin by simply saying this: This is a bad idea. Not because "there will be consequences", or "the community will be sad", but because you have a game with incredible potential and y...
Forum Discussion
I know how that feels, but I had doubts about Battle for Neighborville when they've removed almost all the aspects from Garden Warfare that made the game enjoyable.
The best thing to do is move on to a different franchise or find a new hobby. BFN is known to be responsible for killing the franchise.
@MrGamer8000 Bfn is such an oddpoint in pvz. I seriously wonder what made popcap decide to make a bad overwatch clone instead of just building upon a series that was already highly successful. Even more so after the great reception to the tale of the taco and walnut hills in gw2.
Everytime i ever play nowadays I just keep thinking "I could be playing a more refined version of the same game in gw". Seriously how do you make a game that go backs on several basic features from gw1 back in 2014 like the awful changes to base capturing and Suburbination bases or the absolutely sluggish ttk compared to gw.
Even the environments feel weak as I explained in aesthetic post and the even bigger push to cartoony designs by the series (yeah its always been cartoonish but bfn and 3 just feels flanderized at points, especially with how much they try and inject more bits of humor into it).
Everytime i ever play nowadays I just keep thinking "I could be playing a more refined version of the same game in gw". Seriously how do you make a game that go backs on several basic features from gw1 back in 2014 like the awful changes to base capturing and Suburbination bases or the absolutely sluggish ttk compared to gw.
Even the environments feel weak as I explained in aesthetic post and the even bigger push to cartoony designs by the series (yeah its always been cartoonish but bfn and 3 just feels flanderized at points, especially with how much they try and inject more bits of humor into it).
- @stukapooka Apparently all the hard work goes to PvE contents when the majority of PvZ shooters have always been about PvP.
One thing I liked about BFN is when you destroy objects such as crates or cars, it yields coins. Overall, I wasn't too fond of the game not including what makes the game fun. Right now, I'm done with PvZ shooters and I've been over EA itself since Battlefront 2 launched.- @MrGamer8000 Apparently bfn was originally suppose to just be a pve game but over time they mustve slapped the pvp onto it. It really sticks out with the maps being reused pve assets and a clear sign of where the budget went.
I've mostly been playing GW2 as it has more to do solo than GW, and I hit max level in BfN, and already had all the achievements and 100% free roam regions done. There isn't much of an incentive to go back there as the multiplayer maps aren't as fun as the GW games, and the Ops are nowhere near as good as they were in the GW games either.
While I'm happy that we can still play all 3 games, we really need a new PvZ shooter as the current ones have been in maintenance mode for years now. The lack of any evidence of a sequel is depressing at this stage since PvZ3 is still in an iffy state, and it's the only actively developed PvZ game I can think of (PvZ2 is still up and running and doing well, but it's been out for a long time now). There are still a lot of people that play the current shooters, but a new one would be best, and the sooner the better so we don't lose more people; although don't release it in the same state that BfN was in during Founders, as that's part of why it didn't do so well.
Featured Places
