Forum Discussion
9 years ago
Ok, grinning... so you do an autopsy on someone who died from a poisoned bullet to the toe... what do you think they would say the cause of death was? The bullet or the poison?
So, that explains my logic. Explain yours.
So, that explains my logic. Explain yours.
Anonymous
9 years agoThe poisoned bullet would most likely be the cause of death.
The poison, the bullet, the gun, and the person who fired it are all responsible.
- 9 years ago
But take way the poison from the bullet. Then, the thing that was shot would have survived. So, it wasn't the bullet, the gun, or the person who fired the gun that killed the creature. But, add poison to the bullet, and that creature dies from the poison. Using this logic, we can say that the poison was responsible for the death of the creature.
- Anonymous9 years ago
No
Would you hold the car responsible when someone hits a pedestrian?
The poison doesn't kill on its own. It is used as a tool/weapon to kill plants
- 9 years agoNot the same correlation. The damageh from the car killed the person. The bullet damage did not. The effect from the bullet (poison) did.
The car and the bullet are the same, they both do direct damage. The poison is an effect after that damage. The car just didn't have "deadly" attached to it.
About Plants vs. Zombies™ Franchise Discussion
Zombies trying to enter your house? Keep them in check and discuss the best gardening techniques on the community forum.27,646 PostsLatest Activity: 2 hours ago
Recent Discussions
- 14 hours ago