Solved
Players who rage quit.
Now that we can see our opponent's names in battle, can we also start a blacklist of players who rage quit or would that go against any terms of service surrounding libeling? Although we still get...
Forum Discussion
Oh my goodness, they don't?! Lol
Look the point is, there are 3 options.
Let they have play out. Concede. Quit.
Conceding is fastest, then quitting.
If they're so bad they don't want another round. Quitting is fastest for them.
The other thing to remember... this is a mobile only game. You can't use the excuse of, "don't play if you can't finish" when signal matters.
It's not a burden and you still get credit for a win, they still get a loss. So really, where's the harm?
Look the point is, there are 3 options.
Let they have play out. Concede. Quit.
Conceding is fastest, then quitting.
If they're so bad they don't want another round. Quitting is fastest for them.
The other thing to remember... this is a mobile only game. You can't use the excuse of, "don't play if you can't finish" when signal matters.
It's not a burden and you still get credit for a win, they still get a loss. So really, where's the harm?
I usually quit if I don't play another game, conceding is annoying and takes much longer.
- Approved
I'll say again;
Force quitting and restarting the app on an iphone is a much much much much faster way of getting a new game than conceding.
End of story.
- We get that, grinning... but believe it or not, iphone isn't the majority anymore, by far. On android it's faster to concede. I still agree with your sentiment n though. There's no reason to punish quitters
My issue against the rage quitters is that they often interfere with my achieving a quest. When quests are your only route to free gems, it's annoying to have to play one more game just to get a few more life points or play big plants/zombies.
Featured Places
