Forum Discussion
Anonymous
9 years agoBank 2,400 is a good idea. I support it. I would even be happy with only 1,200.
The 10gems/ad will only happen if players stop watching ads. As long as they keep watching them for 5 gems, there is no incentive for the devs to change it. Even for 2-3 gems, many would still watch them. I personally went from watching 20/day to 5-6/week.
5 gems for a defeat has already been discussed and it is not a good idea. It would encourage bad players to just concede on turn 1 to get easy 5 tickets. If it can be implemented only when the game goes until the end (or at least turn 6/7), why not.
Happy?
The 10gems/ad will only happen if players stop watching ads. As long as they keep watching them for 5 gems, there is no incentive for the devs to change it. Even for 2-3 gems, many would still watch them. I personally went from watching 20/day to 5-6/week.
5 gems for a defeat has already been discussed and it is not a good idea. It would encourage bad players to just concede on turn 1 to get easy 5 tickets. If it can be implemented only when the game goes until the end (or at least turn 6/7), why not.
Happy?
9 years ago
You're the only one being snarky, and because we disagreed. 21 wins a week. If that's to much for you, you don't deserve to keep up (for free). YOU CAN GET TWO OF EACH EVENT CARD WITHOUT EVER PLAYING A SINGLE PERSON!!
In done being nice to you. You've been rude to everyone who disagrees.
One more snide remark, i have Andy take care of your thread.
If you wanna discuss this like an adult, fine, but you've been rude to everyone presenting counter arguments. Grow up.
In done being nice to you. You've been rude to everyone who disagrees.
One more snide remark, i have Andy take care of your thread.
If you wanna discuss this like an adult, fine, but you've been rude to everyone presenting counter arguments. Grow up.
- Anonymous9 years agoDaalnnii
Who are you to tell me anything?
I presented my ideas, and my reasons, and you have done nothing but judge me (incorrectly I might add) and personally attack me based on my reasons.
When the reasons really don't matter so much as the ideas themselves.
If you scroll through this entire thread and read your responses, and then mine to you and others I think anyone will see that.
So for whatever the reason, You have been upset, and then you come on here and publicly threaten me? Why? I'm simply responding to what you have decided to personally directed at me. And if you feel the need to get Andy and kill the thread that's fine. We can then involve Pop Cap/EA customer service and go from there.
People have a right to communicate their ideas and not be attacked for them...
And when the idea comes from someone who's spent close to a grand on their game... one would think that they would at least HEAR what I have to say without attacking me and calling me a narcissistic and other things, over something so simple as an idea.
If ANYONE should be upset here, it should be me, as you JUST THREATENED me, for absolutely ZERO REASON.
Have a good day sir.
About Plants vs. Zombies™ Franchise Discussion
Zombies trying to enter your house? Keep them in check and discuss the best gardening techniques on the community forum.27,709 PostsLatest Activity: 45 minutes ago
Recent Discussions
- 45 minutes ago
- 6 hours ago
- 24 hours ago
- 2 days ago