@benn1nat0rWell, about the lobbies, BFM ends up having its lobbies killed by bots, people see about 3 or 4 bots and imagine the session is dead I'll quit, which happened a little in GW2 due to the fact that it doesn't have bots, and by how Matchmaking works the games to fill up much faster, and on toxicity it's funny BFN game for almost 1 year and it never occurred to me, but when I tried to play a little GW2 yesterday I found 3 people purposely focusing on me, which is curious since the GW2 has a reputation for not being toxic lol, it's about being frustrating, he is, ohhh boy TTK extremely fast, with open maps, elemental damage, along with 90% of the characters being rock hard, allies hit box is from the map being so poorly made, makes GW2 very frustrating.
It's about active players here some things that I found.
@TheSprinter85 I do recognize many people like GW2 and that it is considered to be a great game. I found some stuff I like about it, but most things I dislike. I just can't force myself to like it. I have tried it 3 times since BfN was released and hate it just as much as when it first launched. "Hate" might be a bit too much, that only really refers to the multiplayer. I'm mostly referring to the TTK and lack of sprinting, as well as the extremely unbalanced variant system. Ops I great. it is more action focused, while BfN Ops is more relaxing.
@gametrieuk It seems like both games have quite a few toxic players, but nothing I experienced in BfN was as bad as what I witnessed by playing GW2 for just 1 hour.
I really dislike the TTK in GW2. I guess it contributed to the game being more well know, but I still hate it. Due to the lack of sprinting it takes ages to get anyehrer and once you arrive, you're vanquished in 2 seconds. It simply isn't fun. I know it sounds like I'm just bad at the game. I'm almost always in the top 3 in BfN and struggle a bit in GW2, but I already found out how to be good in GW2. I just dislike the predominant GW2 playstyles. In my experience, players perform well in GW2 if the either play hyper aggressively or snipe with non-snipers. Many said sniping was worse in BfN, because damage drop-off ins't in the game. In GW2 sniping is better than playing normally. Yes, you deal less damage, but you still deal enough damage to vanquish your opponent from a safe distance behind cover. This way, you get huge vanquish streaks.
The GW1 TT maps are sniper heaven. Cacti often got most vanquishes in these matches and it can be frustrating to attack the points if the plants have a couple good snipers. Snipers can be obnoxious in any of the games but they always felt worst in GW1 as GW2 and BfN have less wide open sniper lanes than GW1 did.
@Iron_Guard8 Thank you for joining the discussion and sharing your opinion in this much detail. I will probably add mine on some points you mentioned that I haven't covered in my previous post / replies later, as I feel like your post deserves to be discussed as much as the others 🙂. All of the detail is really impressive and I recognize it must have taken a long time to write.
I'll start with these few minor points:
