I do think its bad idear in general because it is a randomized factor that can overthrow one players gameplan without any interaction of decks.
In my opinion it is one of the worst misconceptions in Gamedesign that has grown quite big lately that randomness can improve a competetive environment.
Sure, it allows for those moments where streamers can scream like monkeys and throw their fecees at the wall over how lucky they or their opponents are, but RNG shouldn´t participate to much in the outcome of a game. Consistency is much better.
While you cannot eliminate RNG completely from a CCG it shouldn´t be dominated by it.
>it´s always hogger
@wonoz My thoughts exactly.
While I appreciate the desire to make the game more interesting, I agree with the other posters that this is one aspect that should remain as is for League battles. I wouldn't mind there being a different battle set where we could agree that lanes would not be standard, along with other rules, much like the offline Missions.
BPRD
