Forum Discussion
@GammaX6My honest opinion is that the $30-$40 price tag is an intentional move to better justify microtransactions in the game without completely following the free to play route like Apex. I'm not going to completely argue with it. There is a decent amount of single player content in BFN. As long as the $30-$40 price tag prevents the season pass from feeling like a horrible grind, I'm good with it. I love Apex, but it took around 6 hours of play every day for 2.5 months to 100% season 2. Needless to say I'm taking a hiatus for season 3.
If the season passes for BFN resembles Apex's season pass in terms of grind and time required, I'm going to say we would've been better off with a purely free to play model or paying $60.
But that's just my opinion and I'm hoping for the best. I'm just talking about worst case scenarios.
I'm not saying all microtransactions are bad either. At lease they aren't selling lootboxes.
@newbebop I guess I'm not the only one who stopped playing Apex Legends. I started feeling like I was a slave to the battle pass. Having to login everyday to do everything is just a chore that weighed me down. While also having to play with randoms who do the same exact thing.
I loved the game mechanics/sound-design/responsiveness of Apex Legends. But both Battlepass and solo-queue teammates made the game a nightmare for me. I'm free... I play BFN whenever I want without strings attached.
Sorry for the off-topic xD
Needed to vent off with Apex Legends a bit.
About Plants vs. Zombies™ Franchise Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 11 hours ago
- 2 days ago