Forum Discussion
After reading through this series of posts it is very clear what is taking place...a couple + years ago I contacted EA and asked this simple question - “Are feeder cities legal?” After 3 or 4 exchanges (obviously in conjunction with their legal department) I finally got an answer - “An individual may play multiple cities but they can not be used as a satellite or feeder city.” I had this reviewed by an appropriate professional who confirmed the response came from a legally recognized representative of the company and was a binding statement of fact. I have shared this previously and got called all kinds of names but that’s ok it’s simply a reflection of them as a person.
In answer to the rhetorical question from one of the posters “Are you a cheater”... actually yes, whether you know it or not. Don’t worry, I don’t think they’re after an individual, I believe this is an effort to address these multiple feeder clubs feeding there primary club. If by chance this makes it inconvenient to feed your primary city, all the better, levels the playing field.
PinnacleValley I think your missing the point, this is not about feeder cities it is about hacked cities feeding legit cities with large quantities of war items between wars.
Feeder cities are perfectly fine, if legit, no difference to clubs with players sharing items. Or indeed selling items on the trade HQ.
This change may well slow these players refuelling with hundreds of items between wars but does have an impact to legit players sharing or selling war items to Dan.... Not a very elegant solution.
About SimCity BuildIt
Recent Discussions
- 4 hours ago
- 7 hours ago
- 9 hours ago
- 11 hours ago