Forum Discussion
@Edairman198526That might be your opinion, but personally I like almost everything in that game less than in BFII, including gameplay and balance.
I mean the aerial and Iden Versio combine the most annoying and cheesy aspects of a BF2015 soldier.
For the maps, no thanks. I'm having enough of GA and walker assault OT era (cauldron type) maps that only encourage camping, boring combat and spawnfarming, the worst in BF2015.
The Supremacy mode with it's different objective layout and all is what both games should've had in the first place.
For heroes, which ones are even viable for a continued run except Bossk and Krennic? None probably, because even as Krennic one of the many cheaters will just one-shot you across the map with the DH-17.
All opinions and preferences of course. However, if they should ever pull BFII then I'm not going to play BF2015 again just because there are no other options left.
Except maybe to watch the warzone inside the chatbox once in a while. The community is very special.
- 4 years ago
@TRlALON There’s zero doubt that BF 2015 is more balanced than BF 2. By FAR.
Yeah, BF 2 may have more characters and more game variety but nearly all of it is broken due to bad design.
it’s not even as if it’s just a few bugs we could avoid; it’s simply bad logic and bad design and you can’t get around that. BF 2 doesn’t provide a rewarding gameplay experience and the players who still do play it don’t feel that it does they’re just Star Wars fans.
I would have more respect for EA & DICE if they said “ok, we know we really messed this up; we’re going to pull it and we’ll let you know when we can do better.” .. At least they’d be honest.
if you go to a restaurant and the chef gets your order way wrong do you just accept it or do you send it back to be done right? Well in this case we can’t get the game re-made because it’s end of life but id rather send a bad game back then let it continue to pull in people who discover it sucks; just like I’d send back a bad steak rather then keep it, even if I couldn’t have a new one.
- 4 years ago@TRlALON Walker Assault is way superior than the broken Galactic Assault where an Anakin, Yoda, or a stamina titan Luke can barricade chokepoints and secure victory without drop of sweat.
- 4 years ago
@Edairman198526 I 100% agree. Walker Assault was more simplistic and just worked better. It wasn’t bloated. GA & CS had so much extra assets added to those game modes they became clumsy.
There’s an old adage; sometimes less is more. I think that speaks true about gameplay integrity for BF 2015. The ridiculous amount and broken nature of enforcers was one of the worst additions that we didn’t need.
The game modes in BF 2 had potential but they ruined it in the same way adding too much salt to food ruins it.
- 4 years ago
@VetteC5RXagreed...I think Battlefront 2 was better without Anakin's broken abilities, just like Battlefront 2015 was better without the broken Chewbacca. They could had balanced Battlefront 2 by increasing the cost of non era heroes to like 20,000 BP, while varying cost for lightsaber and blaster ones. The current state of the game is one built to fit a random Joe Schmuck specific gameplay style, while not taking into account balancing between factions. Clearly the Republic and CIS are more entuned to each other while rebels and resistance are extremely overpowered.
About STAR WARS™ Battlefront™ II
Recent Discussions
- 7 hours ago
- 13 hours ago
- 13 hours ago
Cant look around s
Solved23 hours ago