What's worse? Afkers or menu sitters?
Been mulling this over (again) recently. But what do people find to be worse/more annoying. Those that do afk in a match, or start that way, or those that die and stay in the menu until they can ge...
Forum Discussion
For me it's menu sitters. Especially bad in later stages of GA where I have seen 8 to 10+ people camping the menu. If those players were actually playing then a win might happen.
However neither are worse than teams that camp the package in strike. Completely game breaking.
People waiting in the menu are worse
Afk players will always disappear afterwards
But what's more irritating is a Hero who doesn't play the objective
Just then I played a game of supremacy on Yavin 4 as the Rebels
Someone got Han solo and stayed at the start of the map shooting the whole time and moving forward not quite to the crossroad In front
But when the opposite side turns up than ran back to the start and shot from there
This player was a lv 39 solo
We just lost the game
AFK timers in this game are too short nowadays, and AFK farming is pointless for months. I never play bigger modes, so menu sitters are irrelevant to me, but in a contest, menu sitters are definitely worse nowadays. However, AFKers were a major nuisance at one point in the history of this game.
