Why wasn't this mentioned EA?
According to the reveiw it seems there is no change to the grind of the game.
You lowered the prices but also made it so we get less credits. So that basically doesn't change anything when when it comes to time.
Why were these changes not mentioned also in the lasted statement? Only changes mentioned were hero cost.
***Spoiler warning in the article about the campaign even though it is extremely typical and unoriginal***
@kwhiskey13 wrote:
@Fred_vdp wrote:
@kwhiskey13 wrote:
You lowered the prices but also made it so we get less credits.You get fewer credits for finishing the single player campaign. The reward is equal to the cost of unlocking the campaign character as a hero in multiplayer, so when the prices went down, so did the reward. All other rewards should still be the same.
I don't see how lowering the cost for the heroes and then lowering the reward changes anything it will still take about the same amount of time if you are making less credits. In the article it states there are much more changes to credit rewards not just the campaign. They also made it harder to earn credits in arcade mode.
Hi, as I understand it there was only one single reward changed, the reward you get for completing the campaign. As mentioned this is intended to be used to unlock Iden, but is given as a credit reward in case someone has unlocked her already, or just wants to use the credits for different things. Overall Hero costs are significantly reduced, but the "free" Iden from the campaign completion is unchanged.
Also the article doesn't say any other changes were made. The quote from the article is: "What else is different? I need to find out."
Anyway, I don't want to dissuade discussion/constructive criticism, but I wanted to make sure folks had the right info.
