Would you pay for a subscription?
I'm surprised they developed this game as long as they did. It definitely lasted longer than Battlefront 1 (RIP). EA squeezed as much money out of this game as they could and I understand they can'...
Forum Discussion
Hell no I wouldn't. I already paid them for the game itself and even it doesn't function on PC, with every single match flooded with 1hp hackers spamming racial slurs in admin chat. Why would I give them even more money, when the product is currently a defective ripoff?
"Oh but then they'd use that money to pay for people to fix it!" BS. This is a AAA game that sold over 10 million copies; they shouldn't need subscription fees to provide the absolute bare minimum of anti-cheat/anti-exploit support for a game, especially one this recent (there isn't even a newer title in the franchise, yet, for crying out loud).
I can understand they can't support it with new content forever, but completely abandoning it to hackers is unacceptable to me and no other MP game I've ever played has asked for a subscription fee for the "privilege" of not dealing with hackers. That's just absurd.
They just needed a more complete and tested game at release
Then it could of been a different story
Plus not jump and act on the nerf brigade all the time
Extraction was a big hit and they let it die with no new maps
So basically I'm not buying a half made AAA game that's not fully tested and then pay for updates.
Featured Places
