5* Holdo and Rose needed multiple times in today’s platoons? Why? [MERGE]

CG is a business. So far, the tactic of including p2p toons in platoons has netted them larger profits. They'll stop doing it when it stops working.

"Vampire_X;c-1446045" wrote:
All new toons have been used in the same way, so its not new or a grab on a specific toon.

Not liking the concept is a good feedback, but its not aimed at the Holdo/Rose kits specifically. I think your bigger idea is wanting the ability to fill platoons totally everytime and thats part of the game ecosystem with releases (again not saying You have to like it) but instead of a specific toon being angry about this time , it could be a good conversation about alternatives or ideas with platoon/use as oppossed to CG is evil because this toon this week same argument.

That’s fair enough, a constructive solution or 2 from me would be fine I’m sure, alas I don’t make the game. I actually have no issue with CG at all, they have made my hands down favourite mobile game ever. It’s the overlords I’m not very keen on. My only solution is to not make it so tough to fill these platoons. So when we realised at TB original launch that we all needed multiple Lobots, Mob Enforcer, Aayla etc etc, well we went and farmed those newly required toons, but it’s hard to score when the goalposts always shift.

"Maurosanero;c-1446051" wrote:
Putting all those P2P characters in platoons is an unqualified disaster

I agree.

@Vampire_X

TB are supposed to be a team effort not a wallet effort: i keep farming for a toon, my guildmates goes for another toon and so on...

Peace

"Maurosanero;c-1446075" wrote:
@Vampire_X

TB are supposed to be a team effort not a wallet effort: i keep farming for a toon, my guildmates goes for another toon and so on...

Peace

This too , we will have no choice but to accept it and move on.

"GrandAdmiralSledge;c-1446054" wrote:
CG is a business. So far, the tactic of including p2p toons in platoons has netted them larger profits. They'll stop doing it when it stops working.

I'm actually quite skeptical of that. People in my guild were once upon a time deliberately working on toons/ships that were weakpoints in platoon allocation and now they aren't because they realize there isn't any value in doing it.

I just wanted to thank you for putting Holdo in 3 or our platoons. Just keep moving those goal post farther and farther away. We love that as a community

Moving to LSTB section.

It would have been nice for her and Rose to appear in platoons that were low-tiered enough for the F2P people to participate. The P2P people should be fine and a lot of them probably burned through their crystals this morning to get both of the new Resistance ladies up to the appropriate level.

I have more concern about the JTRey, as she's only available via an event that shows no sign of returning anytime soon and many F2P players weren't able to get their Vets to a place where they could unlock her.

"AnnerDoon;c-1446116" wrote:
I don't know why there's any surprise. They said it was going to work like this. Plus... there's never been a finish line in this game, just checkpoints along the way.

You can always have some whale join your guild, why complain?

And in case your sarcasm detector failed, yes, I am being sarcastic.